Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / MHK VS TILE

MHK vs TILE

Mohawk Industries Inc. and Interface Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

MHK vs TILE, at a glance
Metric MHK TILE
Revenue$10.8B$1.4B
Net income$369.9M$116.1M
Gross margin23.9%38.7%
Net margin3.4%8.4%
Return on equity4.7%20.6%
Diluted EPS$5.93$1.96
Dividend / share·$0.06
Payout ratio·3.1%
Free cash flow$616.2M$121.7M
Equity$8.4B$640.7M
Net debt / equity0.14×0.17×
Current ratio2.19×2.34×
Revenue CAGR 5y2.5%4.7%
Profit CAGR 5y−6.4%·

MHK bills 7.8× the revenue of TILE, and TILE keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.4% against 3.4%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

MHK vs TILE, revenue by year
Fiscal year MHK TILE
FY2025$10.8B$1.4B
FY2024$10.8B$1.3B
FY2023$11.1B$1.3B
FY2022$11.7B$1.3B
FY2021$11.2B$1.2B
FY2020$9.6B$1.1B
FY2019$10.0B$1.3B
FY2018$10.0B$1.2B
FY2017$9.5B$996.4M
FY2016$9.0B$958.6M
Net income by year

Bottom line

MHK vs TILE, net income by year
Fiscal year MHK TILE
FY2025$369.9M$116.1M
FY2024$514.7M$86.9M
FY2023$-449.0M$44.5M
FY2022$25.2M$19.6M
FY2021$1.0B$55.2M
FY2020$515.6M$-71.9M
FY2019$744.2M$79.2M
FY2018$861.7M$50.3M
FY2017$971.6M$53.2M
FY2016$930.4M$54.2M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$9,398,546,000MHK
FY2024+$9,521,242,000MHK
FY2023+$9,873,602,000MHK
FY2022+$10,439,181,000MHK
FY2021+$10,000,215,000MHK
FY2020+$8,448,935,000MHK
FY2019+$8,627,643,000MHK
FY2018+$8,804,061,000MHK
FY2017+$8,494,847,000MHK
FY2016+$8,000,470,000MHK
FY2015+$7,069,700,000MHK
FY2014+$6,799,543,000MHK
FY2013+$6,388,765,000MHK
FY2012+$4,855,960,000MHK
FY2011+$4,689,213,000MHK
FY2010+$4,456,758,000MHK
FY2009+$4,484,136,000MHK

MHK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−4.9 ppTILE
FY2024−1.9 ppTILE
FY2023−7.6 ppTILE
FY2022−1.3 ppTILE
FY2021+4.6 ppMHK
FY2020+11.9 ppMHK
FY2019+1.6 ppMHK
FY2018+4.4 ppMHK
FY2017+4.9 ppMHK
FY2016+4.8 ppMHK
FY2015+0.4 ppMHK
FY2014+4.3 ppMHK
FY2013−0.3 ppTILE
FY2012+3.7 ppMHK
FY2011−0.9 ppTILE
FY2010+2.5 ppMHK
FY2009−1.4 ppTILE

The higher net margin has changed hands between MHK and TILE over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MHK's net margin has been more volatile than TILE's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 3.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.3.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between MHK and TILE over these 17 fiscal years — MHK led in 10 and TILE in 7.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

TILE's return on equity has been more volatile than MHK's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 10.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.6.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between MHK and TILE over these 16 fiscal years — MHK led in 5 and TILE in 11.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages