Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CULP VS MHK

CULP vs MHK

Culp Inc. and Mohawk Industries Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CULP vs MHK, at a glance
Metric CULP MHK
Revenue$203.5M$10.8B
Net income$-10.2M$369.9M
Gross margin12.4%23.9%
Net margin−5.0%3.4%
Return on equity−19.3%4.7%
Diluted EPS−$0.81$5.93
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio··
Free cash flow$-10.0M$616.2M
Equity·$8.4B
Net debt / equity·0.14×
Current ratio1.79×2.19×
Revenue CAGR 5y−7.5%2.5%
Profit CAGR 5y·−6.4%

MHK bills 53.0× the revenue of CULP, and CULP closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CULP vs MHK, revenue by year
Fiscal year CULP MHK
FY2025$203.5M$10.8B
FY2024$213.2M$10.8B
FY2023$225.3M$11.1B
FY2022$234.9M$11.7B
FY2021$294.8M$11.2B
FY2020$299.7M$9.6B
FY2019$256.2M$10.0B
FY2018$281.3M$10.0B
FY2017$323.7M$9.5B
FY2016$309.5M$9.0B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CULP vs MHK, net income by year
Fiscal year CULP MHK
FY2025$-10.2M$369.9M
FY2024$-19.1M$514.7M
FY2023$-13.8M$-449.0M
FY2022$-31.5M$25.2M
FY2021$-3.2M$1.0B
FY2020$3.2M$515.6M
FY2019$-28.7M$744.2M
FY2018$5.5M$861.7M
FY2017$20.9M$971.6M
FY2016$22.3M$930.4M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$10,581,918,000MHK
FY2024−$10,623,663,000MHK
FY2023−$10,909,767,000MHK
FY2022−$11,502,166,000MHK
FY2021−$10,905,774,000MHK
FY2020−$9,252,477,000MHK
FY2019−$9,714,506,000MHK
FY2018−$9,702,309,000MHK
FY2017−$9,167,565,000MHK
FY2016−$8,649,543,000MHK
FY2015−$7,758,703,000MHK
FY2014−$7,493,280,000MHK
FY2013−$7,061,592,000MHK
FY2012−$5,519,166,000MHK
FY2011−$5,387,815,000MHK
FY2010−$5,102,266,000MHK
FY2009−$5,137,608,000MHK

MHK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−8.4 ppMHK
FY2024−13.7 ppMHK
FY2023−2.1 ppMHK
FY2022−13.6 ppMHK
FY2021−10.3 ppMHK
FY2020−4.3 ppMHK
FY2019−18.7 ppMHK
FY2018−6.7 ppMHK
FY2017−3.8 ppMHK
FY2016−3.2 ppMHK
FY2015−2.2 ppMHK
FY2014−2.0 ppMHK
FY2013+1.3 ppCULP
FY2012+2.5 ppCULP
FY2011+2.1 ppCULP
FY2010+3.9 ppCULP
FY2009+6.4 ppCULP

The higher net margin has changed hands between CULP and MHK over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CULP's net margin has been more volatile than MHK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 6.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.8.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CULP and MHK over these 17 fiscal years — CULP led in 5 and MHK in 12.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CULP's return on equity has been more volatile than MHK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 17.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.8.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CULP and MHK over these 17 fiscal years — CULP led in 7 and MHK in 10.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages