MSFT vs XYZ
Microsoft Corp. and Block, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | MSFT | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $331.8B | $24.2B |
| Net income | $133.7B | $1.3B |
| Gross margin | 67.9% | 42.8% |
| Net margin | 40.3% | 5.4% |
| Return on equity | 34.0% | 6.0% |
| Diluted EPS | $17.95 | $2.10 |
| Dividend / share | $3.64 | · |
| Payout ratio | 19.8% | · |
| Free cash flow | $67.0B | $2.4B |
| Equity | $442.4B | $22.2B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.04× | · |
| Current ratio | 1.23× | 2.20× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 14.6% | 20.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 16.9% | 43.7% |
MSFT bills 13.7× the revenue of XYZ, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (40.3% against 5.4%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | MSFT | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $331.8B | $24.2B |
| FY2024 | $281.7B | $24.1B |
| FY2023 | $245.1B | $21.9B |
| FY2022 | $211.9B | $17.5B |
| FY2021 | $198.3B | $17.7B |
| FY2020 | $168.1B | $9.5B |
| FY2019 | $143.0B | $4.7B |
| FY2018 | $125.8B | $3.3B |
| FY2017 | $110.4B | $2.2B |
| FY2016 | $96.6B | $1.7B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | MSFT | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $133.7B | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $101.8B | $2.9B |
| FY2023 | $88.1B | $9.8M |
| FY2022 | $72.4B | $-540.7M |
| FY2021 | $72.7B | $166.3M |
| FY2020 | $61.3B | $213.1M |
| FY2019 | $44.3B | $375.4M |
| FY2018 | $39.2B | $-38.5M |
| FY2017 | $16.6B | $-62.8M |
| FY2016 | $25.5B | $-171.6M |
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$307,645,317,000 | MSFT |
| FY2024 | +$257,602,947,000 | MSFT |
| FY2023 | +$223,206,377,000 | MSFT |
| FY2022 | +$194,383,413,000 | MSFT |
| FY2021 | +$180,608,797,000 | MSFT |
| FY2020 | +$158,590,422,000 | MSFT |
| FY2019 | +$138,301,500,000 | MSFT |
| FY2018 | +$122,544,823,000 | MSFT |
| FY2017 | +$108,145,747,000 | MSFT |
| FY2016 | +$94,862,279,000 | MSFT |
| FY2015 | +$89,886,882,000 | MSFT |
| FY2014 | +$92,729,808,000 | MSFT |
MSFT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 12 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +34.9 pp | MSFT |
| FY2024 | +24.3 pp | MSFT |
| FY2023 | +36.1 pp | MSFT |
| FY2022 | +37.3 pp | MSFT |
| FY2021 | +35.8 pp | MSFT |
| FY2020 | +34.2 pp | MSFT |
| FY2019 | +23.0 pp | MSFT |
| FY2018 | +32.3 pp | MSFT |
| FY2017 | +17.9 pp | MSFT |
| FY2016 | +36.4 pp | MSFT |
| FY2015 | +36.7 pp | MSFT |
| FY2014 | +31.2 pp | MSFT |
MSFT has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 12 fiscal years.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MSFT's net margin has been more volatile than XYZ's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 8.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.4.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
MSFT led in net margin in every one of the 12 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
XYZ's return on equity has been more volatile than MSFT's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 23.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.9.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
MSFT led in return on equity in every one of the 12 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.