NOA vs PBA
North American Construction Group Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation, side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in CAD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | NOA | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CAD 1.3B | CAD 7.8B |
| Net income | CAD 33.8M | CAD 1.7B |
| Gross margin | 12.6% | 41.1% |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 21.8% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% | 11.8% |
| Diluted EPS | CAD 1.14 | CAD 2.66 |
| Dividend / share | CAD 0.48 | — |
| Payout ratio | 39.6% | −484.2% |
| Free cash flow | CAD -17.0M | — |
| Equity | CAD 456.6M | CAD 15.8B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.42× | 0.62× |
| Current ratio | 0.88× | 0.61× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.8% | 5.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −7.2% | — |
PBA bills 6.1× the revenue of NOA, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (21.8% against 2.6%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | NOA | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CAD 1.3B | CAD 7.8B |
| FY2024 | CAD 1.2B | CAD 7.4B |
| FY2023 | CAD 964.7M | CAD 6.3B |
| FY2022 | CAD 769.5M | CAD 11.6B |
| FY2021 | CAD 654.1M | CAD 8.6B |
| FY2020 | CAD 498.5M | CAD 6.0B |
| FY2019 | CAD 719.1M | CAD 6.4B |
| FY2018 | CAD 410.1M | CAD 7.4B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | NOA | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CAD 33.8M | CAD 1.7B |
| FY2024 | CAD 44.0M | CAD 1.9B |
| FY2023 | CAD 63.1M | CAD 1.8B |
| FY2022 | CAD 67.4M | CAD 3.0B |
| FY2021 | CAD 51.4M | CAD 1.2B |
| FY2020 | CAD 49.2M | CAD -316.0M |
| FY2019 | CAD 36.9M | CAD 1.5B |
| FY2018 | CAD 15.3M | CAD 411.0M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280
More in this industry
Other pairs
The companies