OTEX vs SAIC
Open Text Corp. and Science Applications International Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | OTEX | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $7.3B |
| Net income | $643.0M | $358.0M |
| Gross margin | 73.7% | 12.0% |
| Net margin | 12.3% | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 16.2% | 23.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.58 | $7.70 |
| Dividend / share | $1.10 | $0.37 |
| Payout ratio | 41.7% | 19.6% |
| Free cash flow | $807.5M | $577.0M |
| Equity | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.20× | 1.54× |
| Current ratio | 0.81× | 1.20× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.2% | 0.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 15.7% | · |
SAIC bills 1.4× the revenue of OTEX, and OTEX keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.3% against 4.9%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | OTEX | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.2B | $7.3B |
| FY2024 | $5.2B | $7.5B |
| FY2023 | $5.8B | $7.4B |
| FY2022 | $4.5B | $7.7B |
| FY2021 | $3.5B | $7.4B |
| FY2020 | $3.4B | $7.1B |
| FY2019 | $3.1B | $6.4B |
| FY2018 | $2.9B | $4.7B |
| FY2017 | $2.8B | $4.5B |
| FY2016 | $2.3B | $4.4B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | OTEX | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $643.0M | $358.0M |
| FY2024 | $435.9M | $362.0M |
| FY2023 | $465.1M | $477.0M |
| FY2022 | $150.4M | $300.0M |
| FY2021 | $397.1M | $277.0M |
| FY2020 | $310.7M | $209.0M |
| FY2019 | $234.2M | $226.0M |
| FY2018 | $285.5M | $137.0M |
| FY2017 | $242.2M | $179.0M |
| FY2016 | $1.0B | $143.0M |
15 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$2,015,599,000 | SAIC |
| FY2024 | −$2,310,595,000 | SAIC |
| FY2023 | −$1,674,423,000 | SAIC |
| FY2022 | −$3,219,020,000 | SAIC |
| FY2021 | −$3,900,156,000 | SAIC |
| FY2020 | −$3,669,885,000 | SAIC |
| FY2019 | −$3,269,264,000 | SAIC |
| FY2018 | −$1,790,245,000 | SAIC |
| FY2017 | −$1,638,759,000 | SAIC |
| FY2016 | −$2,150,943,000 | SAIC |
| FY2015 | −$2,490,772,000 | SAIC |
| FY2014 | −$2,033,083,000 | SAIC |
| FY2013 | −$2,496,301,000 | SAIC |
| FY2012 | −$3,417,664,000 | SAIC |
| FY2011 | −$3,525,527,000 | SAIC |
SAIC has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 15 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
15 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +7.3 pp | OTEX |
| FY2024 | +3.6 pp | OTEX |
| FY2023 | +1.7 pp | OTEX |
| FY2022 | −0.6 pp | SAIC |
| FY2021 | +7.6 pp | OTEX |
| FY2020 | +6.2 pp | OTEX |
| FY2019 | +3.9 pp | OTEX |
| FY2018 | +7.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2017 | +4.6 pp | OTEX |
| FY2016 | +41.6 pp | OTEX |
| FY2015 | +12.9 pp | OTEX |
| FY2014 | +9.0 pp | OTEX |
| FY2013 | +10.7 pp | OTEX |
| FY2012 | +7.1 pp | OTEX |
| FY2011 | +6.5 pp | OTEX |
The higher net margin has changed hands between OTEX and SAIC over this period.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
OTEX's net margin has been more volatile than SAIC's over the 15 comparable fiscal years — 9.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.9.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between OTEX and SAIC over these 15 fiscal years — OTEX led in 14 and SAIC in 1.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
SAIC's return on equity has been more volatile than OTEX's over the 15 comparable fiscal years — 10.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.5.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
SAIC led in return on equity in every one of the 15 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
15 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.