PCCYF vs RCON
PetroChina Co. Ltd. and Recon Technology, Ltd., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | PCCYF | RCON |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CNY 3.2T | CNY 109.9M |
| Net income | CNY 149.4B | CNY -29.7M |
| Gross margin | · | 33.2% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | −28.8% |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | −5.7% |
| Diluted EPS | · | −CNY 266.52 |
| Dividend / share | CNY 0.22 | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | CNY 150.4B | · |
| Equity | CNY 1.4T | CNY 566.3M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.10× | · |
| Current ratio | 0.98× | 2.73× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.8% | 18.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 44.7% | · |
PCCYF bills 29474.2× the revenue of RCON, and RCON closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | PCCYF | RCON |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | CNY 3.2T | CNY 67.1M |
| FY2021 | CNY 2.6T | CNY 83.8M |
| FY2020 | CNY 1.9T | CNY 47.9M |
| FY2019 | CNY 2.5T | CNY 65.8M |
| FY2018 | CNY 2.4T | CNY 102.4M |
| FY2017 | CNY 2.0T | CNY 84.7M |
| FY2016 | CNY 1.6T | CNY 60.1M |
| FY2015 | CNY 1.7T | CNY 42.7M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | PCCYF | RCON |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | CNY 149.4B | CNY -59.2M |
| FY2021 | CNY 92.2B | CNY 95.6M |
| FY2020 | CNY 19.0B | CNY -22.8M |
| FY2019 | CNY 45.7B | CNY -19.2M |
| FY2018 | CNY 53.0B | CNY -25.4M |
| FY2017 | CNY 23.5B | CNY -44.1M |
| FY2016 | CNY 7.9B | CNY -31.4M |
| FY2015 | CNY 35.5B | CNY -40.9M |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | +CNY 3,239,099,885,622 | PCCYF |
| FY2021 | +CNY 2,614,265,222,429 | PCCYF |
| FY2020 | +CNY 1,933,788,061,425 | PCCYF |
| FY2019 | +CNY 2,516,744,239,349 | PCCYF |
| FY2018 | +CNY 2,374,831,615,673 | PCCYF |
| FY2017 | +CNY 2,032,213,287,954 | PCCYF |
| FY2016 | +CNY 1,616,842,945,538 | PCCYF |
| FY2015 | +CNY 1,725,385,271,723 | PCCYF |
PCCYF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | +96.7 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2021 | −108.2 pp | RCON |
| FY2020 | +55.7 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2019 | +33.3 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2018 | +28.3 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2017 | +55.5 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2016 | +53.8 pp | PCCYF |
| FY2015 | +98.1 pp | PCCYF |
The higher net margin has changed hands between PCCYF and RCON over this period.
8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
RCON's net margin has been more volatile than PCCYF's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 61.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.2.
8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between PCCYF and RCON over these 8 fiscal years — PCCYF led in 7 and RCON in 1.
8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
RCON's return on equity has been more volatile than PCCYF's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 36.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.5.
7 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between PCCYF and RCON over these 7 fiscal years — PCCYF led in 6 and RCON in 1.
7 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.