Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / SHW VS TSCO

SHW vs TSCO

Sherwin Williams Co. and Tractor Supply Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

SHW vs TSCO, at a glance
Metric SHW TSCO
Revenue$23.6B$15.5B
Net income$2.6B$1.1B
Gross margin48.8%36.4%
Net margin10.9%7.1%
Return on equity59.4%45.2%
Diluted EPS$10.26$2.06
Dividend / share$3.16$0.92
Payout ratio30.7%44.5%
Free cash flow$2.7B$740.5M
Equity$4.6B$2.6B
Net debt / equity2.06×0.61×
Current ratio0.87×1.34×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.1%7.9%
Profit CAGR 5y4.8%7.9%

SHW bills 1.5× the revenue of TSCO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.9% against 7.1%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

SHW vs TSCO, revenue by year
Fiscal year SHW TSCO
FY2025$23.6B$15.5B
FY2024$23.1B$14.9B
FY2023$23.1B$14.6B
FY2022$22.1B$14.2B
FY2021$19.9B$12.7B
FY2020$18.4B$10.6B
FY2019$17.9B$8.4B
FY2018$17.5B$7.9B
FY2017$15.0B$7.3B
FY2016$11.9B$6.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

SHW vs TSCO, net income by year
Fiscal year SHW TSCO
FY2025$2.6B$1.1B
FY2024$2.7B$1.1B
FY2023$2.4B$1.1B
FY2022$2.0B$1.1B
FY2021$1.9B$997.1M
FY2020$2.0B$749.0M
FY2019$1.5B$562.4M
FY2018$1.1B$532.4M
FY2017$1.7B$422.6M
FY2016$1.1B$437.1M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$8,050,254,000SHW
FY2024+$8,215,269,000SHW
FY2023+$8,496,159,000SHW
FY2022+$7,944,183,000SHW
FY2021+$7,213,495,000SHW
FY2020+$7,741,348,000SHW
FY2019+$9,548,869,000SHW
FY2018+$9,623,454,000SHW
FY2017+$7,727,418,000SHW
FY2016+$5,076,023,000SHW
FY2015+$5,112,493,000SHW
FY2014+$5,418,285,000SHW
FY2013+$5,021,216,000SHW
FY2012+$4,869,880,000SHW
FY2011+$4,533,257,000SHW
FY2010+$4,138,088,000SHW
FY2009+$3,887,312,000SHW
FY2008+$4,971,778,000SHW

SHW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+3.8 ppSHW
FY2024+4.2 ppSHW
FY2023+2.8 ppSHW
FY2022+1.5 ppSHW
FY2021+1.5 ppSHW
FY2020+4.0 ppSHW
FY2019+1.9 ppSHW
FY2018−0.4 ppTSCO
FY2017+5.7 ppSHW
FY2016+3.1 ppSHW
FY2015+2.7 ppSHW
FY2014+1.3 ppSHW
FY2013+1.0 ppSHW
FY2012+0.7 ppSHW
FY2011−0.2 ppTSCO
FY2010+1.3 ppSHW
FY2009+2.4 ppSHW
FY2008+2.4 ppSHW

The higher net margin has changed hands between SHW and TSCO over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SHW's net margin has been more volatile than TSCO's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 2.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.2.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between SHW and TSCO over these 18 fiscal years — SHW led in 16 and TSCO in 2.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SHW's return on equity has been more volatile than TSCO's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 22.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.9.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between SHW and TSCO over these 18 fiscal years — SHW led in 17 and TSCO in 1.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages