TPHS vs ZDPY
Trinity Place Holdings Inc. and Zoned Properties, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | TPHS | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5M | $4.1M |
| Net income | $5.6M | $-2.9M |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | 158.2% | −68.9% |
| Return on equity | · | −63.9% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.09 | −$0.24 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | · | · |
| Equity | $2.2M | $3.1M |
| Net debt / equity | · | 2.23× |
| Current ratio | · | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | −5.2% | 27.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
ZDPY bills 1.2× the revenue of TPHS, and ZDPY closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | TPHS | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $3.5M | $3.8M |
| FY2023 | $33.6M | $2.9M |
| FY2022 | $43.0M | $2.7M |
| FY2021 | $27.3M | $1.8M |
| FY2020 | $1.8M | $1.2M |
| FY2019 | $4.6M | $1.3M |
| FY2018 | $3.7M | $1.2M |
| FY2017 | $1.9M | $2.1M |
| FY2016 | $1.9M | $1.9M |
| FY2010 | $445.1M | $163,500 |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | TPHS | ZDPY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $5.6M | $573,958 |
| FY2023 | $-39.0M | $-540,258 |
| FY2022 | $-20.7M | $-574,355 |
| FY2021 | $-20.8M | $-165,819 |
| FY2020 | $4.3M | $-78,338 |
| FY2019 | $-5.3M | $-12,281 |
| FY2018 | $-7.9M | $-2.0M |
| FY2017 | $-2.0M | $1.4M |
| FY2016 | $-7.4M | $-501,576 |
| FY2010 | $-32.9M | $-1.1M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −$251,289 | ZDPY |
| FY2023 | +$30,715,009 | TPHS |
| FY2022 | +$40,323,910 | TPHS |
| FY2021 | +$25,444,515 | TPHS |
| FY2020 | +$610,558 | TPHS |
| FY2019 | +$3,370,579 | TPHS |
| FY2018 | +$2,478,070 | TPHS |
| FY2017 | −$251,864 | ZDPY |
| FY2016 | +$2,292 | TPHS |
| FY2010 | +$444,969,500 | TPHS |
The higher-revenue side has changed between TPHS and ZDPY over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
10 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | +143.1 pp | TPHS |
| FY2023 | −97.4 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2022 | −26.5 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2021 | −67.2 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2019 | −113.3 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2018 | −48.5 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2017 | −173.7 pp | ZDPY |
| FY2016 | −373.6 pp | ZDPY |
The higher net margin has changed hands between TPHS and ZDPY over this period.
8 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
TPHS's net margin has been more volatile than ZDPY's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 146.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 61.0.
8 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between TPHS and ZDPY over these 8 fiscal years — TPHS led in 1 and ZDPY in 7.
8 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ZDPY's return on equity has been more volatile than TPHS's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 144.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 18.2.
8 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between TPHS and ZDPY over these 8 fiscal years — TPHS led in 3 and ZDPY in 5.
8 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.