ATEYY vs KYOCF
Advantest Corp. and Kyocera Corp., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in JPY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ATEYY | KYOCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | JPY 163.3B | JPY 1.6T |
| Net income | JPY 12.9B | JPY 81.8B |
| Gross margin | 55.4% | 23.9% |
| Net margin | 7.9% | 5.4% |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | 3.5% |
| Diluted EPS | JPY 67.16 | JPY 222.43 |
| Dividend / share | · | JPY 120.00 |
| Payout ratio | 13.5% | 58.6% |
| Free cash flow | JPY 21.3B | JPY 74.8B |
| Equity | JPY 140.9B | JPY 2.3T |
| Net debt / equity | −0.51× | −0.17× |
| Current ratio | 3.32× | 3.52× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 25.1% | 4.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 4.2% |
KYOCF bills 9.7× the revenue of ATEYY, and ATEYY keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (7.9% against 5.4%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
7 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ATEYY | KYOCF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | JPY 163.3B | JPY 1.5T |
| FY2013 | JPY 111.9B | JPY 1.4T |
| FY2012 | JPY 132.9B | JPY 1.3T |
| FY2011 | JPY 141.0B | JPY 1.2T |
| FY2010 | JPY 99.6B | JPY 1.3T |
| FY2009 | JPY 53.2B | JPY 1.1T |
| FY2008 | JPY 76.7B | JPY 1.1T |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ATEYY | KYOCF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | JPY 12.9B | JPY 115.9B |
| FY2013 | JPY -35.5B | JPY 88.8B |
| FY2012 | JPY -3.8B | JPY 66.5B |
| FY2011 | JPY -2.2B | JPY 79.4B |
| FY2010 | JPY 3.2B | JPY 122.4B |
| FY2009 | JPY -11.5B | JPY 40.1B |
| FY2008 | JPY -74.9B | JPY 29.5B |
7 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | −JPY 1,363,207,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2013 | −JPY 1,335,491,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2012 | −JPY 1,147,151,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2011 | −JPY 1,049,822,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2010 | −JPY 1,167,290,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2009 | −JPY 1,020,580,000,000 | KYOCF |
| FY2008 | −JPY 1,051,934,000,000 | KYOCF |
KYOCF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
7 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | −0.3 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2013 | −38.3 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2012 | −8.1 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2011 | −8.7 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2010 | −7.1 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2009 | −25.8 pp | KYOCF |
| FY2008 | −100.7 pp | KYOCF |
KYOCF has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 7 fiscal years.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ATEYY's net margin has been more volatile than KYOCF's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 34.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.3.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
KYOCF led in net margin in every one of the 7 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ATEYY's return on equity has been more volatile than KYOCF's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 18.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.0.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ATEYY and KYOCF over these 7 fiscal years — ATEYY led in 1 and KYOCF in 6.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.