BG vs MDLZ
Bunge Global SA and Mondelez International, Inc., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BG | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $70.3B | $38.5B |
| Net income | $816.0M | $2.5B |
| Gross margin | 4.8% | 28.4% |
| Net margin | 1.2% | 6.4% |
| Return on equity | 6.3% | 9.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $4.91 | $1.89 |
| Dividend / share | $2.80 | $1.94 |
| Payout ratio | 56.2% | 101.5% |
| Free cash flow | $-879.0M | $3.2B |
| Equity | $15.9B | $25.8B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.57× | 0.69× |
| Current ratio | 1.61× | 0.59× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 7.7% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | −7.2% |
BG bills 1.8× the revenue of MDLZ, and MDLZ keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (6.4% against 1.2%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BG | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $70.3B | $38.5B |
| FY2024 | $53.1B | $36.4B |
| FY2023 | $59.5B | $36.0B |
| FY2022 | $67.2B | $31.5B |
| FY2021 | $59.2B | $28.7B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BG | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $816.0M | $2.5B |
| FY2024 | $1.1B | $4.6B |
| FY2023 | $2.2B | $5.0B |
| FY2022 | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| FY2021 | $2.1B | $4.3B |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$31,792,000,000 | BG |
| FY2024 | +$16,667,000,000 | BG |
| FY2023 | +$23,524,000,000 | BG |
| FY2022 | +$35,736,000,000 | BG |
| FY2021 | +$30,432,000,000 | BG |
BG has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −5.2 pp | MDLZ |
| FY2024 | −10.4 pp | MDLZ |
| FY2023 | −9.9 pp | MDLZ |
| FY2022 | −6.2 pp | MDLZ |
| FY2021 | −11.4 pp | MDLZ |
MDLZ has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MDLZ's net margin has been more volatile than BG's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 3.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.0.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
MDLZ led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BG's return on equity has been more volatile than MDLZ's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 7.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between BG and MDLZ over these 5 fiscal years — BG led in 3 and MDLZ in 2.
5 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.