Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BQ VS VIPS

BQ vs VIPS

Boqii Holding Ltd. and Vipshop Holdings Ltd., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BQ vs VIPS, at a glance
Metric BQ VIPS
RevenueCNY 420.5MCNY 105.9B
Net incomeCNY -5.1MCNY 7.2B
Gross margin26.3%23.1%
Net margin−0.4%7.0%
Return on equity−2.7%17.9%
Diluted EPS−CNY 1.47CNY 70.74
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio·24.8%
Free cash flowCNY -30.4MCNY 5.5B
EquityCNY 188.0MCNY 41.0B
Net debt / equity−0.09×−0.42×
Current ratio3.25×1.28×
Revenue CAGR 5y−16.1%0.8%
Profit CAGR 5y··

VIPS bills 251.9× the revenue of BQ, and BQ closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

8 years side by side

BQ vs VIPS, revenue by year
Fiscal year BQ VIPS
FY2025CNY 420.5MCNY 105.9B
FY2024CNY 468.9MCNY 108.4B
FY2023CNY 709.4MCNY 112.9B
FY2022CNY 1.1BCNY 103.2B
FY2021CNY 1.2BCNY 117.1B
FY2020CNY 1.0BCNY 101.9B
FY2019CNY 770.2MCNY 93.0B
FY2018CNY 803.8MCNY 84.5B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BQ vs VIPS, net income by year
Fiscal year BQ VIPS
FY2025CNY -5.1MCNY 7.2B
FY2024CNY -54.1MCNY 7.7B
FY2023CNY -63.7MCNY 8.1B
FY2022CNY -102.8MCNY 6.3B
FY2021CNY -128.4MCNY 4.7B
FY2020CNY -194.4MCNY 5.9B
FY2019CNY -179.0MCNY 4.0B
FY2018CNY -234.2MCNY 2.1B
Revenue gap over time

8 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−CNY 105,499,079,000VIPS
FY2024−CNY 107,951,938,000VIPS
FY2023−CNY 112,146,668,000VIPS
FY2022−CNY 102,060,395,000VIPS
FY2021−CNY 115,873,249,000VIPS
FY2020−CNY 100,847,504,000VIPS
FY2019−CNY 92,224,181,000VIPS
FY2018−CNY 83,720,117,000VIPS

VIPS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

8 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−7.4 ppVIPS
FY2024−19.7 ppVIPS
FY2023−17.0 ppVIPS
FY2022−15.8 ppVIPS
FY2021−15.2 ppVIPS
FY2020−24.9 ppVIPS
FY2019−27.1 ppVIPS
FY2018−31.3 ppVIPS

VIPS has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 8 fiscal years.

8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BQ's net margin has been more volatile than VIPS's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 8.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.6.

8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

VIPS led in net margin in every one of the 8 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

8 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BQ's return on equity has been more volatile than VIPS's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 29.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.

5 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

VIPS led in return on equity in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

5 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages