BTU vs HCC
Peabody Energy Corp. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Net income | $-42.5M | $57.0M |
| Gross margin | — | 25.0% |
| Net margin | −1.1% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | 2.7% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.43 | $1.08 |
| Dividend / share | $0.30 | $0.32 |
| Payout ratio | −85.9% | 31.3% |
| Free cash flow | $-77.7M | $636.7M |
| Equity | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.07× | −0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.85× | 3.19× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.0% | 10.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | — |
BTU bills 2.9× the revenue of HCC, and BTU closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $4.9B | $1.7B |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $1.7B |
| FY2021 | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $782.7M |
| FY2019 | $4.6B | $1.3B |
| FY2018 | $5.6B | $1.4B |
| FY2016 | $4.7B | $297.6M |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-42.5M | $57.0M |
| FY2024 | $403.5M | $250.6M |
| FY2023 | $815.6M | $478.6M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $641.3M |
| FY2021 | $371.4M | $150.9M |
| FY2020 | $-1.9B | $-35.8M |
| FY2019 | $-185.1M | $301.7M |
| FY2018 | $663.8M | $696.8M |
| FY2016 | $-729.3M | $-49.7M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280