BTU vs HCC
Peabody Energy Corp. and Warrior MET Coal, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Net income | $-42.5M | $57.0M |
| Gross margin | · | 25.0% |
| Net margin | −1.1% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | · | 2.7% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.43 | $1.08 |
| Dividend / share | $0.30 | $0.32 |
| Payout ratio | · | 31.3% |
| Free cash flow | $-77.7M | · |
| Equity | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.07× | −0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.85× | 3.19× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.0% | 10.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
BTU bills 2.9× the revenue of HCC, and BTU closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $4.9B | $1.7B |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $1.7B |
| FY2021 | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $782.7M |
| FY2019 | $4.6B | $1.3B |
| FY2018 | $5.6B | $1.4B |
| FY2016 | $4.7B | $297.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTU | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-42.5M | $57.0M |
| FY2024 | $403.5M | $250.6M |
| FY2023 | $815.6M | $478.6M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $641.3M |
| FY2021 | $371.4M | $150.9M |
| FY2020 | $-1.9B | $-35.8M |
| FY2019 | $-185.1M | $301.7M |
| FY2018 | $663.8M | $696.8M |
| FY2016 | $-729.3M | $-49.7M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$2,551,457,000 | BTU |
| FY2024 | +$2,711,480,000 | BTU |
| FY2023 | +$3,270,075,000 | BTU |
| FY2022 | +$3,243,162,000 | BTU |
| FY2021 | +$2,259,084,000 | BTU |
| FY2020 | +$2,098,362,000 | BTU |
| FY2019 | +$3,355,091,000 | BTU |
| FY2018 | +$4,203,793,000 | BTU |
| FY2016 | +$4,417,666,000 | BTU |
BTU has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −5.5 pp | HCC |
| FY2024 | −6.9 pp | HCC |
| FY2023 | −12.1 pp | HCC |
| FY2022 | −10.4 pp | HCC |
| FY2021 | −3.1 pp | HCC |
| FY2020 | −60.5 pp | HCC |
| FY2019 | −27.8 pp | HCC |
| FY2018 | −38.7 pp | HCC |
| FY2016 | +1.4 pp | BTU |
The higher net margin has changed hands between BTU and HCC over this period.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BTU's net margin has been more volatile than HCC's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 25.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 19.6.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between BTU and HCC over these 9 fiscal years — BTU led in 1 and HCC in 8.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BTU's return on equity has been more volatile than HCC's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 76.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 53.9.
3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
HCC led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.