BTU vs NC
Peabody Energy Corp. and Nacco Industries, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTU | NC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $277.2M |
| Net income | $-42.5M | $17.6M |
| Gross margin | — | 13.9% |
| Net margin | −1.1% | 6.3% |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | 4.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.43 | — |
| Dividend / share | $0.30 | $0.98 |
| Payout ratio | −85.9% | 41.7% |
| Free cash flow | $-77.7M | $2.3M |
| Equity | $3.5B | $429.2M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.07× | 0.12× |
| Current ratio | 1.85× | 3.09× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.0% | 16.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | 3.5% |
BTU bills 13.9× the revenue of NC, and BTU closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTU | NC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.9B | $277.2M |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $237.7M |
| FY2023 | $4.9B | $214.8M |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $241.7M |
| FY2021 | $3.3B | $191.8M |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $128.4M |
| FY2019 | $4.6B | $141.0M |
| FY2018 | $5.6B | $135.4M |
| FY2016 | $4.7B | $111.1M |
| FY2015 | $5.6B | $148.0M |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTU | NC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-42.5M | $17.6M |
| FY2024 | $403.5M | $33.7M |
| FY2023 | $815.6M | $-39.6M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $74.2M |
| FY2021 | $371.4M | $48.1M |
| FY2020 | $-1.9B | $14.8M |
| FY2019 | $-185.1M | $39.6M |
| FY2018 | $663.8M | $34.8M |
| FY2016 | $-729.3M | $29.6M |
| FY2015 | $-2.0B | $22.0M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280