Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / BZUN VS VIPS

BZUN vs VIPS

Baozun Inc. and Vipshop Holdings Ltd., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

BZUN vs VIPS, at a glance
Metric BZUN VIPS
RevenueCNY 9.9BCNY 105.9B
Net incomeCNY -242.1MCNY 7.2B
Gross margin74.1%23.1%
Net margin−2.0%7.0%
Return on equity−6.4%17.9%
Diluted EPS−CNY 1.40CNY 70.74
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio−9.2%24.8%
Free cash flowCNY 313.9MCNY 5.5B
EquityCNY 3.6BCNY 41.0B
Net debt / equity0.08×−0.42×
Current ratio1.87×1.28×
Revenue CAGR 5y2.4%0.8%
Profit CAGR 5y··

VIPS bills 10.7× the revenue of BZUN, and BZUN closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

BZUN vs VIPS, revenue by year
Fiscal year BZUN VIPS
FY2025CNY 9.9BCNY 105.9B
FY2024CNY 9.4BCNY 108.4B
FY2023CNY 8.8BCNY 112.9B
FY2022CNY 8.4BCNY 103.2B
FY2021CNY 9.4BCNY 117.1B
FY2020CNY 8.9BCNY 101.9B
FY2019CNY 7.3BCNY 93.0B
FY2018CNY 5.4BCNY 84.5B
FY2017CNY 4.1BCNY 72.9B
FY2016CNY 3.4BCNY 56.6B
Net income by year

Bottom line

BZUN vs VIPS, net income by year
Fiscal year BZUN VIPS
FY2025CNY -242.1MCNY 7.2B
FY2024CNY -185.2MCNY 7.7B
FY2023CNY -278.4MCNY 8.1B
FY2022CNY -653.3MCNY 6.3B
FY2021CNY -219.8MCNY 4.7B
FY2020CNY 426.0MCNY 5.9B
FY2019CNY 281.9MCNY 4.0B
FY2018CNY 269.8MCNY 2.1B
FY2017CNY 209.1MCNY 1.9B
FY2016CNY 85.4MCNY 2.0B
Revenue gap over time

13 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−CNY 95,974,063,000VIPS
FY2024−CNY 98,998,603,000VIPS
FY2023−CNY 104,044,007,000VIPS
FY2022−CNY 94,751,858,000VIPS
FY2021−CNY 107,663,422,000VIPS
FY2020−CNY 93,006,926,000VIPS
FY2019−CNY 85,716,226,000VIPS
FY2018−CNY 79,130,911,000VIPS
FY2017−CNY 68,763,505,000VIPS
FY2016−CNY 53,201,027,000VIPS
FY2015−CNY 37,604,769,000VIPS
FY2014−CNY 21,544,893,000VIPS
FY2013−CNY 8,898,958,000VIPS

VIPS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 13 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

13 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

13 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−9.0 ppVIPS
FY2024−8.7 ppVIPS
FY2023−9.8 ppVIPS
FY2022−13.4 ppVIPS
FY2021−6.2 ppVIPS
FY2020−1.0 ppVIPS
FY2019−0.4 ppVIPS
FY2018+2.5 ppBZUN
FY2017+2.4 ppBZUN
FY2016−1.0 ppVIPS
FY2015−2.9 ppVIPS
FY2014−7.0 ppVIPS
FY2013−5.6 ppVIPS

The higher net margin has changed hands between BZUN and VIPS over this period.

13 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BZUN's net margin has been more volatile than VIPS's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 3.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.7.

13 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between BZUN and VIPS over these 13 fiscal years — BZUN led in 2 and VIPS in 11.

13 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BZUN's return on equity has been more volatile than VIPS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 7.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.9.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

VIPS led in return on equity in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages