CHAI vs IHS
Core AI Holdings, Inc. and IHS Holding Ltd., side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CHAI | IHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.6M | $1.6B |
| Net income | $-25.3M | $143.6M |
| Gross margin | 18.4% | 55.4% |
| Net margin | −217.3% | 8.0% |
| Return on equity | −370.8% | · |
| Diluted EPS | −$154.66 | $0.42 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $-15.1M | $718.7M |
| Equity | · | $-251.3M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.48× | · |
| Current ratio | 0.53× | 2.08× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
IHS bills 136.0× the revenue of CHAI, and CHAI closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
6 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CHAI | IHS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $11.6M | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $8.2M | $1.9B |
| FY2022 | $6.5M | $2.0B |
| FY2021 | $7.5M | $1.6B |
| FY2020 | $6.0M | $1.4B |
| FY2019 | $9.8M | $1.2B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CHAI | IHS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $-25.3M | $-1.6B |
| FY2023 | $-12.9M | $-2.0B |
| FY2022 | $-15.3M | $-459.0M |
| FY2021 | $-23.6M | $-25.8M |
| FY2020 | $-13.6M | $-322.0M |
| FY2019 | $-7.7M | $-423.5M |
6 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −$1,515,570,428 | IHS |
| FY2023 | −$1,917,066,699 | IHS |
| FY2022 | −$1,954,817,090 | IHS |
| FY2021 | −$1,572,184,512 | IHS |
| FY2020 | −$1,397,159,228 | IHS |
| FY2019 | −$1,221,243,812 | IHS |
IHS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 6 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
6 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −109.6 pp | IHS |
| FY2023 | −53.8 pp | IHS |
| FY2022 | −212.1 pp | IHS |
| FY2021 | −311.5 pp | IHS |
| FY2020 | −203.9 pp | IHS |
| FY2019 | −43.6 pp | IHS |
IHS has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 6 fiscal years.
6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CHAI's net margin has been more volatile than IHS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 72.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 41.1.
6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
IHS led in net margin in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
6 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
IHS's return on equity has been more volatile than CHAI's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 118.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 63.8.
5 of 7 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CHAI and IHS over these 5 fiscal years — CHAI led in 1 and IHS in 4.
5 of 7 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.