CHTR vs LILA
Charter Communications, Inc. and Liberty Latin America Ltd., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CHTR | LILA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.8B | $4.4B |
| Net income | $5.0B | $-611.2M |
| Gross margin | · | 78.0% |
| Net margin | 10.5% | −12.5% |
| Return on equity | 31.5% | −74.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $36.21 | −$3.06 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $4.4B | $305.9M |
| Equity | $16.1B | $555.6M |
| Net debt / equity | 5.87× | 13.47× |
| Current ratio | 0.39× | 1.14× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 9.1% | · |
CHTR bills 12.3× the revenue of LILA, and LILA closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CHTR | LILA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $54.8B | $4.4B |
| FY2024 | $55.1B | $4.4B |
| FY2023 | $54.6B | $4.5B |
| FY2022 | $54.0B | $4.8B |
| FY2021 | $51.7B | $4.8B |
| FY2020 | $48.1B | $3.8B |
| FY2019 | $45.8B | $3.9B |
| FY2018 | $43.6B | $3.7B |
| FY2017 | $41.6B | $3.6B |
| FY2016 | $29.0B | $2.7B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CHTR | LILA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.0B | $-611.2M |
| FY2024 | $5.1B | $-689.4M |
| FY2023 | $4.6B | $-73.6M |
| FY2022 | $5.1B | $-170.7M |
| FY2021 | $4.7B | $-440.6M |
| FY2020 | $3.2B | $-687.3M |
| FY2019 | $1.7B | $-106.1M |
| FY2018 | $1.2B | $-345.2M |
| FY2017 | $9.9B | $-778.1M |
| FY2016 | $3.5B | $-432.3M |
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$50,331,800,000 | CHTR |
| FY2024 | +$50,638,200,000 | CHTR |
| FY2023 | +$50,095,900,000 | CHTR |
| FY2022 | +$49,213,400,000 | CHTR |
| FY2021 | +$46,870,700,000 | CHTR |
| FY2020 | +$44,314,600,000 | CHTR |
| FY2019 | +$41,897,000,000 | CHTR |
| FY2018 | +$39,928,300,000 | CHTR |
| FY2017 | +$37,991,000,000 | CHTR |
| FY2016 | +$26,279,200,000 | CHTR |
| FY2015 | +$8,536,700,000 | CHTR |
CHTR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 11 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
11 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +23.0 pp | CHTR |
| FY2024 | +25.5 pp | CHTR |
| FY2023 | +11.6 pp | CHTR |
| FY2022 | +15.1 pp | CHTR |
| FY2021 | +20.5 pp | CHTR |
| FY2020 | +29.0 pp | CHTR |
| FY2019 | +9.7 pp | CHTR |
| FY2018 | +20.6 pp | CHTR |
| FY2017 | +46.6 pp | CHTR |
| FY2016 | +27.7 pp | CHTR |
| FY2015 | −6.5 pp | LILA |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CHTR and LILA over this period.
11 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LILA's net margin has been more volatile than CHTR's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 7.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.4.
11 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CHTR and LILA over these 11 fiscal years — CHTR led in 10 and LILA in 1.
11 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LILA's return on equity has been more volatile than CHTR's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 22.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 15.0.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CHTR led in return on equity in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.