Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / COST VS WMT

COST vs WMT

Costco Wholesale Corp. and Walmart Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

COST vs WMT, at a glance
Metric COST WMT
Revenue$275.2B$713.2B
Net income$8.1B$21.9B
Gross margin12.8%24.9%
Net margin2.9%3.1%
Return on equity30.7%23.0%
Diluted EPS$18.21$2.73
Dividend / share$4.92$0.94
Payout ratio27.0%34.3%
Free cash flow$7.8B$14.9B
Equity$29.2B$99.6B
Net debt / equity−0.29×0.28×
Current ratio1.03×0.79×
Revenue CAGR 5y10.5%5.0%
Profit CAGR 5y15.1%10.1%

WMT bills 2.6× the revenue of COST, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (3.1% against 2.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

COST vs WMT, revenue by year
Fiscal year COST WMT
FY2025$275.2B$713.2B
FY2024$254.5B$681.0B
FY2023$242.3B$648.1B
FY2022$227.0B$611.3B
FY2021$195.9B$572.8B
FY2020$166.8B$559.2B
FY2019$152.7B$524.0B
FY2018$141.6B$514.4B
FY2017$129.0B$500.3B
FY2016$118.7B$485.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

COST vs WMT, net income by year
Fiscal year COST WMT
FY2025$8.1B$21.9B
FY2024$7.4B$19.4B
FY2023$6.3B$15.5B
FY2022$5.8B$11.7B
FY2021$5.0B$13.7B
FY2020$4.0B$13.5B
FY2019$3.7B$14.9B
FY2018$3.1B$6.7B
FY2017$2.7B$9.9B
FY2016$2.4B$13.6B
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$437,928,000,000WMT
FY2024−$426,532,000,000WMT
FY2023−$405,835,000,000WMT
FY2022−$384,335,000,000WMT
FY2021−$376,825,000,000WMT
FY2020−$392,390,000,000WMT
FY2019−$371,261,000,000WMT
FY2018−$372,829,000,000WMT
FY2017−$371,318,000,000WMT
FY2016−$367,154,000,000WMT
FY2015−$365,931,000,000WMT
FY2014−$373,011,000,000WMT
FY2013−$371,138,000,000WMT
FY2012−$369,514,000,000WMT
FY2011−$357,594,000,000WMT
FY2010−$343,903,000,000WMT
FY2009−$336,663,000,000WMT
FY2008−$331,771,000,000WMT

WMT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−0.2 ppWMT
FY2024−0.1 ppWMT
FY2023+0.1 ppCOST
FY2022+0.8 ppCOST
FY2021+0.2 ppCOST
FY2020−0.0 ppWMT
FY2019−0.5 ppWMT
FY2018+0.8 ppCOST
FY2017+0.0 ppCOST
FY2016−0.9 ppWMT
FY2015−1.1 ppWMT
FY2014−1.7 ppWMT
FY2013−1.5 ppWMT
FY2012−2.0 ppWMT
FY2011−1.9 ppWMT
FY2010−2.3 ppWMT
FY2009−2.1 ppWMT
FY2008−1.6 ppWMT

The higher net margin has changed hands between COST and WMT over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

WMT's net margin has been more volatile than COST's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 0.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.4.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between COST and WMT over these 18 fiscal years — COST led in 5 and WMT in 13.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

COST's return on equity has been more volatile than WMT's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 6.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.8.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between COST and WMT over these 18 fiscal years — COST led in 11 and WMT in 7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages