Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CSL VS GT

CSL vs GT

Carlisle Companies Inc. and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CSL vs GT, at a glance
Metric CSL GT
Revenue$5.0B$18.3B
Net income$740.7M$-1.7B
Gross margin35.7%18.4%
Net margin14.8%−9.3%
Return on equity34.8%−43.5%
Diluted EPS$17.12−$5.99
Dividend / share$4.20$0.00
Payout ratio24.4%−0.0%
Free cash flow$970.6M$-30.0M
Equity$1.8B$3.2B
Net debt / equity0.99×1.70×
Current ratio3.09×1.06×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.8%8.2%
Profit CAGR 5y18.3%·

GT bills 3.6× the revenue of CSL, and GT closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CSL vs GT, revenue by year
Fiscal year CSL GT
FY2025$5.0B$18.3B
FY2024$5.0B$18.9B
FY2023$4.6B$20.1B
FY2022$5.4B$20.8B
FY2021$3.8B$17.5B
FY2020$4.0B$12.3B
FY2019$4.5B$14.7B
FY2018$4.5B$15.5B
FY2017$3.8B$15.4B
FY2016$3.4B$15.2B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CSL vs GT, net income by year
Fiscal year CSL GT
FY2025$740.7M$-1.7B
FY2024$1.3B$46.0M
FY2023$767.4M$-729.0M
FY2022$924.0M$202.0M
FY2021$421.7M$764.0M
FY2020$320.1M$-1.3B
FY2019$472.8M$-311.0M
FY2018$611.1M$693.0M
FY2017$365.5M$346.0M
FY2016$250.1M$1.3B
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$13,260,100,000GT
FY2024−$13,874,400,000GT
FY2023−$15,479,100,000GT
FY2022−$15,355,600,000GT
FY2021−$13,641,300,000GT
FY2020−$8,351,100,000GT
FY2019−$10,260,400,000GT
FY2018−$10,995,500,000GT
FY2017−$11,626,200,000GT
FY2016−$11,732,800,000GT
FY2015−$12,899,800,000GT
FY2014−$14,934,000,000GT
FY2013−$16,597,000,000GT
FY2012−$18,140,800,000GT
FY2011−$20,274,600,000GT
FY2010−$16,304,300,000GT
FY2009−$14,042,900,000GT
FY2008−$16,623,400,000GT

GT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+24.1 ppCSL
FY2024+26.0 ppCSL
FY2023+20.4 ppCSL
FY2022+16.0 ppCSL
FY2021+6.5 ppCSL
FY2020+18.2 ppCSL
FY2019+12.6 ppCSL
FY2018+9.1 ppCSL
FY2017+7.4 ppCSL
FY2016−1.2 ppGT
FY2015+6.7 ppCSL
FY2014−6.1 ppGT
FY2013+3.7 ppCSL
FY2012+8.3 ppCSL
FY2011+5.4 ppCSL
FY2010+6.6 ppCSL
FY2009+8.6 ppCSL
FY2008+2.1 ppCSL

The higher net margin has changed hands between CSL and GT over this period.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GT's net margin has been more volatile than CSL's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 5.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.4.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CSL and GT over these 18 fiscal years — CSL led in 16 and GT in 2.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

GT's return on equity has been more volatile than CSL's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 37.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 10.5.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CSL and GT over these 17 fiscal years — CSL led in 11 and GT in 6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages