Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / FLUT VS ZM

FLUT vs ZM

Flutter Entertainment PLC and Zoom Communications, Inc., side by side — 4 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

FLUT vs ZM, at a glance
Metric FLUT ZM
Revenue$16.4B$4.9B
Net income$-407.0M$1.9B
Gross margin45.2%77.0%
Net margin−2.5%39.0%
Return on equity−4.4%20.3%
Diluted EPS−$1.75$6.18
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio··
Free cash flow$1.1B$1.9B
Equity$9.0B$9.8B
Net debt / equity1.15×·
Current ratio0.95×4.33×
Revenue CAGR 5y·12.9%
Profit CAGR 5y·23.1%

FLUT bills 3.4× the revenue of ZM, and FLUT closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

4 years side by side

FLUT vs ZM, revenue by year
Fiscal year FLUT ZM
FY2025$16.4B$4.9B
FY2024$14.0B$4.7B
FY2023$11.8B$4.5B
FY2022$9.5B$4.4B
Net income by year

Bottom line

FLUT vs ZM, net income by year
Fiscal year FLUT ZM
FY2025$-407.0M$1.9B
FY2024$162.0M$1.0B
FY2023$-1.2B$637.5M
FY2022$-370.0M$103.7M
Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ZM's net margin has been more volatile than FLUT's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 13.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.1.

4 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

ZM led in net margin in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

4 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ZM's return on equity has been more volatile than FLUT's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 6.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.

4 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

ZM led in return on equity in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

4 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages