GDDY vs SAIC
GoDaddy Inc. and Science Applications International Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GDDY | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $7.3B |
| Net income | $875.0M | $358.0M |
| Gross margin | 63.6% | 12.0% |
| Net margin | 17.7% | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 192.9% | 23.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $6.22 | $7.70 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.37 |
| Payout ratio | · | 19.6% |
| Free cash flow | $1.6B | $577.0M |
| Equity | $215.1M | $1.5B |
| Net debt / equity | 12.55× | 1.54× |
| Current ratio | 0.61× | 1.20× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 8.3% | 0.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
SAIC bills 1.5× the revenue of GDDY, and GDDY keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (17.7% against 4.9%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GDDY | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.0B | $7.3B |
| FY2024 | $4.6B | $7.5B |
| FY2023 | $4.3B | $7.4B |
| FY2022 | $4.1B | $7.7B |
| FY2021 | $3.8B | $7.4B |
| FY2020 | $3.3B | $7.1B |
| FY2019 | $3.0B | $6.4B |
| FY2018 | $2.7B | $4.7B |
| FY2017 | $2.2B | $4.5B |
| FY2016 | $1.8B | $4.4B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GDDY | SAIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $875.0M | $358.0M |
| FY2024 | $936.9M | $362.0M |
| FY2023 | $1.4B | $477.0M |
| FY2022 | $352.2M | $300.0M |
| FY2021 | $242.3M | $277.0M |
| FY2020 | $-495.1M | $209.0M |
| FY2019 | $137.0M | $226.0M |
| FY2018 | $77.1M | $137.0M |
| FY2017 | $136.4M | $179.0M |
| FY2016 | $-16.5M | $143.0M |
13 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$2,310,900,000 | SAIC |
| FY2024 | −$2,905,800,000 | SAIC |
| FY2023 | −$3,189,900,000 | SAIC |
| FY2022 | −$3,612,700,000 | SAIC |
| FY2021 | −$3,578,300,000 | SAIC |
| FY2020 | −$3,739,300,000 | SAIC |
| FY2019 | −$3,390,900,000 | SAIC |
| FY2018 | −$1,998,900,000 | SAIC |
| FY2017 | −$2,222,100,000 | SAIC |
| FY2016 | −$2,594,100,000 | SAIC |
| FY2015 | −$2,707,700,000 | SAIC |
| FY2014 | −$2,497,700,000 | SAIC |
| FY2013 | −$2,990,200,000 | SAIC |
SAIC has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 13 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
13 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
13 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +12.7 pp | GDDY |
| FY2024 | +15.6 pp | GDDY |
| FY2023 | +25.9 pp | GDDY |
| FY2022 | +4.7 pp | GDDY |
| FY2021 | +2.6 pp | GDDY |
| FY2020 | −17.9 pp | SAIC |
| FY2019 | +1.0 pp | GDDY |
| FY2018 | +0.1 pp | GDDY |
| FY2017 | +2.2 pp | GDDY |
| FY2016 | −4.4 pp | SAIC |
| FY2015 | −10.2 pp | SAIC |
| FY2014 | −14.0 pp | SAIC |
| FY2013 | −20.4 pp | SAIC |
The higher net margin has changed hands between GDDY and SAIC over this period.
13 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GDDY's net margin has been more volatile than SAIC's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 13.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.0.
13 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between GDDY and SAIC over these 13 fiscal years — GDDY led in 8 and SAIC in 5.
13 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GDDY's return on equity has been more volatile than SAIC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 98.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 12.5.
8 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between GDDY and SAIC over these 8 fiscal years — GDDY led in 3 and SAIC in 5.
8 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.