H vs LVS
Hyatt Hotels Corp. and LAS Vegas Sands Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | H | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $13.0B |
| Net income | $-52.0M | $1.6B |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | −0.7% | 14.3% |
| Return on equity | −1.5% | 72.7% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.55 | $2.35 |
| Dividend / share | $0.15 | $1.00 |
| Payout ratio | −109.6% | 51.2% |
| Free cash flow | $159.0M | $1.9B |
| Equity | $3.3B | $1.6B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.05× | 6.80× |
| Current ratio | 0.75× | 1.14× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 28.0% | 34.7% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
LVS bills 1.8× the revenue of H, and H closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | H | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $7.1B | $13.0B |
| FY2024 | $6.6B | $11.3B |
| FY2023 | $6.7B | $10.4B |
| FY2022 | $5.9B | $4.1B |
| FY2021 | $3.0B | $4.2B |
| FY2020 | $2.1B | $2.9B |
| FY2019 | $5.0B | $12.1B |
| FY2018 | $4.5B | $13.7B |
| FY2017 | $4.5B | $12.7B |
| FY2016 | $4.3B | $11.3B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | H | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-52.0M | $1.6B |
| FY2024 | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| FY2023 | $220.0M | $1.2B |
| FY2022 | $455.0M | $1.8B |
| FY2021 | $-222.0M | $-961.0M |
| FY2020 | $-703.0M | $-1.7B |
| FY2019 | $766.0M | $2.7B |
| FY2018 | $769.0M | $2.4B |
| FY2017 | $389.0M | $2.8B |
| FY2016 | $206.0M | $1.7B |
17 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$5,916,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2024 | −$4,650,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2023 | −$3,705,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2022 | +$1,781,000,000 | H |
| FY2021 | −$1,206,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2020 | −$874,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2019 | −$7,107,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2018 | −$9,275,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2017 | −$8,266,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2016 | −$7,006,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2015 | −$7,360,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2014 | −$10,169,000,000 | LVS |
| FY2013 | −$9,585,885,000 | LVS |
| FY2012 | −$7,182,132,000 | LVS |
| FY2011 | −$5,712,745,000 | LVS |
| FY2010 | −$3,326,182,000 | LVS |
| FY2009 | −$1,233,105,000 | LVS |
The higher-revenue side has changed between H and LVS over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
17 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −15.0 pp | LVS |
| FY2024 | +4.0 pp | H |
| FY2023 | −10.5 pp | LVS |
| FY2022 | −25.3 pp | LVS |
| FY2021 | +22.8 pp | H |
| FY2020 | +38.9 pp | H |
| FY2019 | −12.0 pp | LVS |
| FY2018 | −4.2 pp | LVS |
| FY2017 | −16.9 pp | LVS |
| FY2016 | −13.1 pp | LVS |
| FY2015 | −17.5 pp | LVS |
| FY2014 | −16.8 pp | LVS |
| FY2013 | −16.6 pp | LVS |
| FY2012 | −14.7 pp | LVS |
| FY2011 | −17.0 pp | LVS |
| FY2010 | −9.8 pp | LVS |
| FY2009 | +6.7 pp | H |
The higher net margin has changed hands between H and LVS over this period.
17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LVS's net margin has been more volatile than H's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 25.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.4.
17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between H and LVS over these 17 fiscal years — H led in 4 and LVS in 13.
17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LVS's return on equity has been more volatile than H's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 29.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.8.
17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between H and LVS over these 17 fiscal years — H led in 3 and LVS in 14.
17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.