HTZ vs R
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. and Ryder System Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | HTZ | R |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5B | $12.7B |
| Net income | $-747.0M | $499.0M |
| Gross margin | 35.5% | · |
| Net margin | −8.8% | 3.9% |
| Return on equity | · | 16.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.43 | $11.94 |
| Dividend / share | · | $3.44 |
| Payout ratio | · | 29.1% |
| Free cash flow | · | $459.0M |
| Equity | $-459.0M | $3.1B |
| Net debt / equity | · | 2.44× |
| Current ratio | · | 0.89× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.1% | 8.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
R bills 1.5× the revenue of HTZ, and HTZ closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | HTZ | R |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $8.5B | $12.7B |
| FY2024 | $9.0B | $12.6B |
| FY2023 | $9.4B | $11.8B |
| FY2022 | $8.7B | $12.0B |
| FY2021 | $7.3B | $9.7B |
| FY2020 | $5.3B | $8.4B |
| FY2019 | $9.8B | $8.9B |
| FY2018 | $9.5B | $8.4B |
| FY2017 | $8.8B | $7.3B |
| FY2016 | $8.8B | $6.8B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | HTZ | R |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-747.0M | $499.0M |
| FY2024 | $-2.9B | $489.0M |
| FY2023 | $616.0M | $406.0M |
| FY2022 | $2.1B | $867.0M |
| FY2021 | $366.0M | $519.0M |
| FY2020 | $-1.7B | $-122.0M |
| FY2019 | $-58.0M | $-24.4M |
| FY2018 | $-225.0M | $284.6M |
| FY2017 | $327.0M | $719.6M |
| FY2016 | $-491.0M | $263.1M |
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$4,161,000,000 | R |
| FY2024 | −$3,587,000,000 | R |
| FY2023 | −$2,412,000,000 | R |
| FY2022 | −$3,326,000,000 | R |
| FY2021 | −$2,327,000,000 | R |
| FY2020 | −$3,162,000,000 | R |
| FY2019 | +$853,199,000 | HTZ |
| FY2018 | +$1,090,054,000 | HTZ |
| FY2017 | +$1,522,926,000 | HTZ |
| FY2016 | +$2,044,862,000 | HTZ |
| FY2015 | +$2,445,107,000 | HTZ |
| FY2014 | +$2,836,226,000 | HTZ |
The higher-revenue side has changed between HTZ and R over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −12.7 pp | R |
| FY2024 | −35.5 pp | R |
| FY2023 | +3.1 pp | HTZ |
| FY2022 | +16.5 pp | HTZ |
| FY2021 | −0.4 pp | R |
| FY2020 | −31.3 pp | R |
| FY2019 | −0.2 pp | R |
| FY2018 | −5.8 pp | R |
| FY2017 | −6.2 pp | R |
| FY2016 | −9.5 pp | R |
| FY2015 | −1.6 pp | R |
| FY2014 | −4.2 pp | R |
The higher net margin has changed hands between HTZ and R over this period.
12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HTZ's net margin has been more volatile than R's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 15.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.8.
12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between HTZ and R over these 12 fiscal years — HTZ led in 2 and R in 10.
12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HTZ's return on equity has been more volatile than R's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 85.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.7.
9 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between HTZ and R over these 9 fiscal years — HTZ led in 3 and R in 6.
9 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.