Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / JD VS VIPS

JD vs VIPS

JD.com, Inc. and Vipshop Holdings Ltd., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

JD vs VIPS, at a glance
Metric JD VIPS
RevenueCNY 1.3TCNY 105.9B
Net incomeCNY 23.1BCNY 7.2B
Gross margin16.0%23.1%
Net margin1.8%7.0%
Return on equity·17.9%
Diluted EPSCNY 6.45CNY 70.74
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio·24.8%
Free cash flowCNY 11.2BCNY 5.5B
EquityCNY 225.0BCNY 41.0B
Net debt / equity−0.41×−0.42×
Current ratio1.22×1.28×
Revenue CAGR 5y11.9%0.8%
Profit CAGR 5y−14.1%·

JD bills 12.4× the revenue of VIPS, and VIPS keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (7.0% against 1.8%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

JD vs VIPS, revenue by year
Fiscal year JD VIPS
FY2025CNY 1.3TCNY 105.9B
FY2024CNY 1.2TCNY 108.4B
FY2023CNY 1.1TCNY 112.9B
FY2022CNY 1.0TCNY 103.2B
FY2021CNY 951.6BCNY 117.1B
FY2020CNY 745.8BCNY 101.9B
FY2019CNY 576.9BCNY 93.0B
FY2018CNY 462.0BCNY 84.5B
FY2017CNY 362.3BCNY 72.9B
FY2016CNY 258.3BCNY 56.6B
Net income by year

Bottom line

JD vs VIPS, net income by year
Fiscal year JD VIPS
FY2025CNY 23.1BCNY 7.2B
FY2024CNY 44.7BCNY 7.7B
FY2023CNY 23.3BCNY 8.1B
FY2022CNY 9.7BCNY 6.3B
FY2021CNY -4.5BCNY 4.7B
FY2020CNY 49.3BCNY 5.9B
FY2019CNY 11.9BCNY 4.0B
FY2018CNY -2.8BCNY 2.1B
FY2017CNY -11.7MCNY 1.9B
FY2016CNY -3.4BCNY 2.0B
Revenue gap over time

13 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+CNY 1,203,165,454,000JD
FY2024+CNY 1,050,398,168,000JD
FY2023+CNY 971,805,980,000JD
FY2022+CNY 943,083,511,000JD
FY2021+CNY 834,532,322,000JD
FY2020+CNY 643,943,511,000JD
FY2019+CNY 483,893,582,000JD
FY2018+CNY 377,495,811,000JD
FY2017+CNY 289,419,441,000JD
FY2016+CNY 201,698,645,000JD
FY2015+CNY 140,839,088,000JD
FY2014+CNY 91,873,004,000JD
FY2013+CNY 58,919,018,000JD

JD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 13 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

13 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

14 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−5.2 ppVIPS
FY2024−3.4 ppVIPS
FY2023−5.1 ppVIPS
FY2022−5.2 ppVIPS
FY2021−4.5 ppVIPS
FY2020+0.8 ppJD
FY2019−2.2 ppVIPS
FY2018−3.1 ppVIPS
FY2017−2.6 ppVIPS
FY2016−4.8 ppVIPS
FY2015−8.8 ppVIPS
FY2014−7.6 ppVIPS
FY2013−3.2 ppVIPS
FY2012−2.8 ppVIPS

The higher net margin has changed hands between JD and VIPS over this period.

14 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

JD's net margin has been more volatile than VIPS's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 3.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.3.

14 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between JD and VIPS over these 14 fiscal years — JD led in 1 and VIPS in 13.

14 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

VIPS's return on equity has been more volatile than JD's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 71.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 36.0.

5 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

VIPS led in return on equity in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

5 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages