Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / KD VS SAIC

KD vs SAIC

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

KD vs SAIC, at a glance
Metric KD SAIC
Revenue$15.1B$7.3B
Net income$198.0M$358.0M
Gross margin21.8%12.0%
Net margin1.3%4.9%
Return on equity16.5%23.3%
Diluted EPS$0.85$7.70
Dividend / share$0.00$0.37
Payout ratio·19.6%
Free cash flow$340.0M$577.0M
Equity$1.2B$1.5B
Net debt / equity2.62×1.54×
Current ratio0.88×1.20×
Revenue CAGR 5y−4.9%0.6%
Profit CAGR 5y··

KD bills 2.1× the revenue of SAIC, and SAIC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (4.9% against 1.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

7 years side by side

KD vs SAIC, revenue by year
Fiscal year KD SAIC
FY2025$15.1B$7.3B
FY2024$15.1B$7.5B
FY2023$16.1B$7.4B
FY2022$17.0B$7.7B
FY2021$18.7B$7.4B
FY2020$19.4B$7.1B
FY2019$20.3B$6.4B
Net income by year

Bottom line

KD vs SAIC, net income by year
Fiscal year KD SAIC
FY2025$198.0M$358.0M
FY2024$252.0M$362.0M
FY2023$-340.0M$477.0M
FY2022$-1.4B$300.0M
FY2021$-2.3B$277.0M
FY2020$-2.0B$209.0M
FY2019$-943.0M$226.0M
Revenue gap over time

7 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$7,830,000,000KD
FY2024+$7,578,000,000KD
FY2023+$8,608,000,000KD
FY2022+$9,322,000,000KD
FY2021+$11,263,000,000KD
FY2020+$12,296,000,000KD
FY2019+$13,900,000,000KD

KD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

7 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−3.6 ppSAIC
FY2024−3.2 ppSAIC
FY2023−8.5 ppSAIC
FY2022−12.0 ppSAIC
FY2021−16.1 ppSAIC
FY2020−13.4 ppSAIC
FY2019−8.2 ppSAIC

SAIC has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 7 fiscal years.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KD's net margin has been more volatile than SAIC's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 5.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.1.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

SAIC led in net margin in every one of the 7 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

KD's return on equity has been more volatile than SAIC's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 32.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.3.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between KD and SAIC over these 7 fiscal years — KD led in 1 and SAIC in 6.

7 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages