Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / LZB VS MLKN

LZB vs MLKN

La-z-boy Inc. and MillerKnoll, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

LZB vs MLKN, at a glance
Metric LZB MLKN
Revenue$2.1B$3.8B
Net income$102.0M$91.5M
Gross margin44.0%38.8%
Net margin4.8%2.5%
Return on equity9.9%7.0%
Diluted EPS$2.47$1.32
Dividend / share$0.76$0.75
Payout ratio37.2%55.8%
Free cash flow$127.8M$77.6M
Equity$1.0B$1.3B
Net debt / equity·0.83×
Current ratio1.80×1.58×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.2%9.3%
Profit CAGR 5y−0.9%−12.1%

MLKN bills 1.8× the revenue of LZB, and LZB keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (4.8% against 2.5%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

LZB vs MLKN, revenue by year
Fiscal year LZB MLKN
FY2025$2.1B$3.8B
FY2024$2.1B$3.7B
FY2023$2.0B$3.6B
FY2022$2.3B$4.1B
FY2021$2.4B$3.9B
FY2020$1.7B$2.5B
FY2019$1.7B$2.5B
FY2018$1.7B$2.6B
FY2017$1.6B$2.4B
FY2016$1.5B$2.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

LZB vs MLKN, net income by year
Fiscal year LZB MLKN
FY2025$102.0M$91.5M
FY2024$99.6M$-36.9M
FY2023$122.6M$82.3M
FY2022$150.7M$42.1M
FY2021$150.0M$-27.1M
FY2020$106.5M$174.6M
FY2019$77.5M$-8.7M
FY2018$68.6M$160.5M
FY2017$80.9M$128.1M
FY2016$85.9M$123.9M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$1,715,065,000MLKN
FY2024−$1,560,693,000MLKN
FY2023−$1,581,373,000MLKN
FY2022−$1,737,667,000MLKN
FY2021−$1,589,189,000MLKN
FY2020−$730,856,000MLKN
FY2019−$782,618,000MLKN
FY2018−$821,799,000MLKN
FY2017−$797,253,000MLKN
FY2016−$758,140,000MLKN
FY2015−$739,502,000MLKN
FY2014−$716,805,000MLKN
FY2013−$524,682,000MLKN
FY2012−$501,023,000MLKN
FY2011−$557,395,000MLKN
FY2010−$462,057,000MLKN
FY2009−$139,588,000MLKN

MLKN has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+2.3 ppLZB
FY2024+5.7 ppLZB
FY2023+3.8 ppLZB
FY2022+5.3 ppLZB
FY2021+7.0 ppLZB
FY2020−1.1 ppMLKN
FY2019+5.2 ppLZB
FY2018−2.2 ppMLKN
FY2017−0.3 ppMLKN
FY2016+0.3 ppLZB
FY2015−0.8 ppMLKN
FY2014+0.5 ppLZB
FY2013+5.3 ppLZB
FY2012−0.1 ppMLKN
FY2011+3.3 ppLZB
FY2010−2.8 ppMLKN
FY2009+0.5 ppLZB

The higher net margin has changed hands between LZB and MLKN over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MLKN's net margin has been more volatile than LZB's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 2.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.5.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between LZB and MLKN over these 17 fiscal years — LZB led in 11 and MLKN in 6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MLKN's return on equity has been more volatile than LZB's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 18.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.7.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between LZB and MLKN over these 17 fiscal years — LZB led in 7 and MLKN in 10.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages