Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / AMR VS BTU

AMR vs BTU

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corp., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

AMR vs BTU, at a glance
Metric AMR BTU
Revenue$2.1B$3.9B
Net income$-61.7M$-42.5M
Gross margin9.6%·
Net margin−2.9%−1.1%
Return on equity−3.9%·
Diluted EPS−$4.75−$0.43
Dividend / share·$0.30
Payout ratio−0.7%·
Free cash flow$17.8M$-77.7M
Equity$1.5B$3.5B
Net debt / equity−0.23×−0.07×
Current ratio4.47×1.85×
Revenue CAGR 5y8.5%6.0%
Profit CAGR 5y··

BTU bills 1.8× the revenue of AMR, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

8 years side by side

AMR vs BTU, revenue by year
Fiscal year AMR BTU
FY2025$2.1B$3.9B
FY2024$3.0B$4.2B
FY2023$3.5B$4.9B
FY2022$4.1B$5.0B
FY2021$2.3B$3.3B
FY2020$1.4B$2.9B
FY2019$2.0B$4.6B
FY2018$2.0B$5.6B
Net income by year

Bottom line

AMR vs BTU, net income by year
Fiscal year AMR BTU
FY2025$-61.7M$-42.5M
FY2024$187.6M$403.5M
FY2023$722.0M$815.6M
FY2022$1.4B$1.3B
FY2021$288.8M$371.4M
FY2020$-446.9M$-1.9B
FY2019$-316.3M$-185.1M
FY2018$299.2M$663.8M
Revenue gap over time

8 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$1,732,019,000BTU
FY2024−$1,279,415,000BTU
FY2023−$1,475,283,000BTU
FY2022−$880,308,000BTU
FY2021−$1,059,614,000BTU
FY2020−$1,464,913,000BTU
FY2019−$2,622,120,000BTU
FY2018−$3,550,595,000BTU

BTU has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

8 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−1.8 ppBTU
FY2024−3.2 ppBTU
FY2023+4.3 ppAMR
FY2022+8.8 ppAMR
FY2021+1.6 ppAMR
FY2020+33.5 ppAMR
FY2019−11.8 ppBTU
FY2018+2.8 ppAMR

The higher net margin has changed hands between AMR and BTU over this period.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

BTU's net margin has been more volatile than AMR's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 26.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 19.9.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between AMR and BTU over these 8 fiscal years — AMR led in 5 and BTU in 3.

8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages