BOC vs GOOD
Boston Omaha Corp. and Gladstone Commercial Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BOC | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.4M | $161.3M |
| Net income | $-12.4M | $19.3M |
| Gross margin | 65.8% | 92.8% |
| Net margin | −16.0% | 12.0% |
| Return on equity | −2.4% | 11.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.40 | $0.14 |
| Dividend / share | · | $1.20 |
| Payout ratio | · | 353.5% |
| Free cash flow | $-10.0M | · |
| Equity | $516.1M | $171.8M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.04× | 4.85× |
| Current ratio | 1.98× | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.1% | 3.9% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 5.2% |
GOOD bills 1.4× the revenue of BOC, and BOC closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BOC | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $114.4M | $161.3M |
| FY2024 | $108.3M | $149.4M |
| FY2023 | $96.3M | $147.6M |
| FY2022 | $81.2M | $149.0M |
| FY2021 | $57.0M | $137.7M |
| FY2020 | $45.7M | $133.2M |
| FY2019 | $41.4M | $114.4M |
| FY2018 | $20.0M | $106.8M |
| FY2017 | $9.0M | $94.8M |
| FY2016 | $3.8M | $86.4M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BOC | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-12.4M | $19.3M |
| FY2024 | $-1.3M | $24.0M |
| FY2023 | $-7.0M | $5.0M |
| FY2022 | $10.2M | $10.8M |
| FY2021 | $52.7M | $10.9M |
| FY2020 | $-49,089 | $14.9M |
| FY2019 | $-1.5M | $9.6M |
| FY2018 | $-9.1M | $12.3M |
| FY2017 | $-6.5M | $5.9M |
| FY2016 | $-3.2M | $4.0M |
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$46,959,652 | GOOD |
| FY2024 | −$41,113,099 | GOOD |
| FY2023 | −$51,330,264 | GOOD |
| FY2022 | −$67,746,806 | GOOD |
| FY2021 | −$80,716,189 | GOOD |
| FY2020 | −$87,408,537 | GOOD |
| FY2019 | −$72,997,862 | GOOD |
| FY2018 | −$86,776,607 | GOOD |
| FY2017 | −$85,784,655 | GOOD |
| FY2016 | −$82,528,483 | GOOD |
| FY2015 | −$83,043,088 | GOOD |
| FY2014 | −$73,712,126 | GOOD |
| FY2013 | −$61,309,451 | GOOD |
| FY2012 | −$51,164,878 | GOOD |
GOOD has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 14 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
14 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
12 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −28.0 pp | GOOD |
| FY2024 | −13.0 pp | GOOD |
| FY2023 | −9.7 pp | GOOD |
| FY2022 | +5.5 pp | BOC |
| FY2021 | +89.5 pp | BOC |
| FY2020 | −16.6 pp | GOOD |
| FY2019 | −11.9 pp | GOOD |
| FY2018 | −57.3 pp | GOOD |
| FY2017 | −78.1 pp | GOOD |
| FY2016 | −87.1 pp | GOOD |
| FY2015 | −149.2 pp | GOOD |
| FY2012 | −98.0 pp | GOOD |
The higher net margin has changed hands between BOC and GOOD over this period.
12 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BOC's net margin has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 59.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.
12 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between BOC and GOOD over these 12 fiscal years — BOC led in 2 and GOOD in 10.
12 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BOC's return on equity has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 5.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.9.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between BOC and GOOD over these 10 fiscal years — BOC led in 1 and GOOD in 9.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.