BTU vs CODQL
Peabody Energy Corp. and Coronado Global Resources Inc., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTU | CODQL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $1.9B |
| Net income | $-42.5M | $-432.1M |
| Gross margin | · | 21.8% |
| Net margin | −1.1% | −22.2% |
| Return on equity | · | −50.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.43 | −$2.58 |
| Dividend / share | $0.30 | · |
| Payout ratio | · | −1.9% |
| Free cash flow | $-77.7M | $-324.8M |
| Equity | $3.5B | · |
| Net debt / equity | −0.07× | 0.79× |
| Current ratio | 1.85× | 1.55× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.0% | 5.9% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
BTU bills 2.0× the revenue of CODQL, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTU | CODQL |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.9B | $1.9B |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $2.5B |
| FY2023 | $4.9B | $2.9B |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $3.6B |
| FY2021 | $3.3B | $2.1B |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $1.5B |
| FY2019 | $4.6B | $2.2B |
| FY2018 | $5.6B | $2.0B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTU | CODQL |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-42.5M | $-432.1M |
| FY2024 | $403.5M | $-108.9M |
| FY2023 | $815.6M | $156.1M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $771.7M |
| FY2021 | $371.4M | $189.4M |
| FY2020 | $-1.9B | $-226.5M |
| FY2019 | $-185.1M | $305.5M |
| FY2018 | $663.8M | $114.7M |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$1,911,713,000 | BTU |
| FY2024 | +$1,728,987,000 | BTU |
| FY2023 | +$2,056,097,000 | BTU |
| FY2022 | +$1,410,358,000 | BTU |
| FY2021 | +$1,169,829,000 | BTU |
| FY2020 | +$1,418,838,000 | BTU |
| FY2019 | +$2,407,652,000 | BTU |
| FY2018 | +$3,601,296,000 | BTU |
BTU has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +21.1 pp | BTU |
| FY2024 | +13.9 pp | BTU |
| FY2023 | +11.1 pp | BTU |
| FY2022 | +4.9 pp | BTU |
| FY2021 | +2.4 pp | BTU |
| FY2020 | −49.5 pp | CODQL |
| FY2019 | −17.8 pp | CODQL |
| FY2018 | +6.1 pp | BTU |
The higher net margin has changed hands between BTU and CODQL over this period.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BTU's net margin has been more volatile than CODQL's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 26.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 13.8.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between BTU and CODQL over these 8 fiscal years — BTU led in 6 and CODQL in 2.
8 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.