BTU vs METC
Peabody Energy Corp. and Ramaco Resources, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTU | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $536.6M |
| Net income | $-42.5M | $-51.4M |
| Gross margin | — | 15.5% |
| Net margin | −1.1% | −9.6% |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | −12.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.43 | — |
| Dividend / share | $0.30 | $0.06 |
| Payout ratio | −85.9% | −8.4% |
| Free cash flow | $-77.7M | $78.1M |
| Equity | $3.5B | $483.6M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.07× | 0.06× |
| Current ratio | 1.85× | 5.46× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.0% | 26.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | — |
BTU bills 7.2× the revenue of METC, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTU | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.9B | $536.6M |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $666.3M |
| FY2023 | $4.9B | $693.5M |
| FY2022 | $5.0B | $565.7M |
| FY2021 | $3.3B | $283.4M |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $168.9M |
| FY2019 | $4.6B | $168.9M |
| FY2018 | $5.6B | $227.6M |
| FY2016 | $4.7B | $5.2M |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTU | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-42.5M | $-51.4M |
| FY2024 | $403.5M | $11.2M |
| FY2023 | $815.6M | $82.3M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $116.0M |
| FY2021 | $371.4M | $39.8M |
| FY2020 | $-1.9B | $-4.9M |
| FY2019 | $-185.1M | $24.9M |
| FY2018 | $663.8M | $25.1M |
| FY2016 | $-729.3M | $-7.5M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280