Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CDRO VS SGHC

CDRO vs SGHC

Codere Online Luxembourg, S.a. and Super Group (sghc) Ltd., side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in EUR, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CDRO vs SGHC, at a glance
Metric CDRO SGHC
Revenue€200.7M€1.7B
Net income€3.9M€113.1M
Gross margin84.1%·
Net margin1.9%6.7%
Return on equity17.3%21.0%
Diluted EPS€0.08€0.22
Dividend / share·€0.04
Payout ratio··
Free cash flow·€271.4M
Equity€24.1M€557.5M
Net debt / equity·−0.67×
Current ratio1.40×1.25×
Revenue CAGR 5y26.7%28.9%
Profit CAGR 5y··

SGHC bills 8.5× the revenue of CDRO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (6.7% against 1.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

6 years side by side

CDRO vs SGHC, revenue by year
Fiscal year CDRO SGHC
FY2024€200.7M€1.7B
FY2023€161.6M€1.4B
FY2022€115.7M€1.3B
FY2021€80.3M€1.3B
FY2020€70.5M€908.0M
FY2019€61.6M€476.0M
Net income by year

Bottom line

CDRO vs SGHC, net income by year
Fiscal year CDRO SGHC
FY2024€3.9M€113.1M
FY2023€-2.4M€-10.6M
FY2022€-46.4M€181.4M
FY2021€-68.1M€235.9M
FY2020€-16.3M€149.2M
FY2019€-16.1M€-17.9M
Revenue gap over time

6 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024−€1,496,150,000SGHC
FY2023−€1,274,470,000SGHC
FY2022−€1,176,463,000SGHC
FY2021−€1,240,405,000SGHC
FY2020−€837,522,000SGHC
FY2019−€414,457,000SGHC

SGHC has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 6 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

6 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

5 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2024−4.7 ppSGHC
FY2023−0.9 ppSGHC
FY2022−54.2 ppSGHC
FY2021−102.6 ppSGHC
FY2019−22.4 ppSGHC

SGHC has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.

5 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CDRO's net margin has been more volatile than SGHC's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 31.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.3.

5 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

SGHC led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

5 of 6 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CDRO's return on equity has been more volatile than SGHC's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 50.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 15.3.

3 of 4 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

SGHC led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

3 of 4 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages