CODQL vs HCC
Coronado Global Resources Inc. and Warrior MET Coal, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Net income | $-432.1M | $57.0M |
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 25.0% |
| Net margin | −22.2% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | −50.2% | 2.7% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.58 | $1.08 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.32 |
| Payout ratio | −1.9% | 31.3% |
| Free cash flow | $-324.8M | · |
| Equity | · | $2.1B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.79× | −0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.55× | 3.19× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.9% | 10.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CODQL bills 1.5× the revenue of HCC, and CODQL closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| FY2022 | $3.6B | $1.7B |
| FY2021 | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| FY2020 | $1.5B | $782.7M |
| FY2019 | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| FY2018 | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| FY2017 | $768.2M | $1.2B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-432.1M | $57.0M |
| FY2024 | $-108.9M | $250.6M |
| FY2023 | $156.1M | $478.6M |
| FY2022 | $771.7M | $641.3M |
| FY2021 | $189.4M | $150.9M |
| FY2020 | $-226.5M | $-35.8M |
| FY2019 | $305.5M | $301.7M |
| FY2018 | $114.7M | $696.8M |
| FY2017 | $142.4M | $455.0M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$639,744,000 | CODQL |
| FY2024 | +$982,493,000 | CODQL |
| FY2023 | +$1,213,978,000 | CODQL |
| FY2022 | +$1,832,804,000 | CODQL |
| FY2021 | +$1,089,255,000 | CODQL |
| FY2020 | +$679,524,000 | CODQL |
| FY2019 | +$947,439,000 | CODQL |
| FY2018 | +$602,497,000 | CODQL |
| FY2017 | −$400,848,000 | HCC |
The higher-revenue side has changed between CODQL and HCC over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −26.5 pp | HCC |
| FY2024 | −20.8 pp | HCC |
| FY2023 | −23.1 pp | HCC |
| FY2022 | −15.3 pp | HCC |
| FY2021 | −5.4 pp | HCC |
| FY2020 | −10.9 pp | HCC |
| FY2019 | −10.0 pp | HCC |
| FY2018 | −44.8 pp | HCC |
| FY2017 | −20.4 pp | HCC |
HCC has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 9 fiscal years.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HCC's net margin has been more volatile than CODQL's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 16.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 14.1.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
HCC led in net margin in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
HCC's return on equity has been more volatile than CODQL's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 38.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 32.8.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CODQL and HCC over these 9 fiscal years — CODQL led in 2 and HCC in 7.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.