CODQL vs METC
Coronado Global Resources Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $536.6M |
| Net income | $-432.1M | $-51.4M |
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 15.5% |
| Net margin | −22.2% | −9.6% |
| Return on equity | −50.2% | −12.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.58 | −$0.99 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | −1.9% | −8.4% |
| Free cash flow | $-324.8M | · |
| Equity | · | $483.6M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.79× | 0.06× |
| Current ratio | 1.55× | 5.46× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.9% | 26.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CODQL bills 3.6× the revenue of METC, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.9B | $536.6M |
| FY2024 | $2.5B | $666.3M |
| FY2023 | $2.9B | $693.5M |
| FY2022 | $3.6B | $565.7M |
| FY2021 | $2.1B | $283.4M |
| FY2020 | $1.5B | $168.9M |
| FY2019 | $2.2B | $168.9M |
| FY2018 | $2.0B | $227.6M |
| FY2017 | $768.2M | $61.0M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-432.1M | $-51.4M |
| FY2024 | $-108.9M | $11.2M |
| FY2023 | $156.1M | $82.3M |
| FY2022 | $771.7M | $116.0M |
| FY2021 | $189.4M | $39.8M |
| FY2020 | $-226.5M | $-4.9M |
| FY2019 | $305.5M | $24.9M |
| FY2018 | $114.7M | $25.1M |
| FY2017 | $142.4M | $-15.4M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$1,413,169,000 | CODQL |
| FY2024 | +$1,841,418,000 | CODQL |
| FY2023 | +$2,197,079,000 | CODQL |
| FY2022 | +$3,005,854,000 | CODQL |
| FY2021 | +$1,865,077,000 | CODQL |
| FY2020 | +$1,293,347,000 | CODQL |
| FY2019 | +$2,046,833,000 | CODQL |
| FY2018 | +$1,752,930,000 | CODQL |
| FY2017 | +$707,208,000 | CODQL |
CODQL has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −12.6 pp | METC |
| FY2024 | −6.0 pp | METC |
| FY2023 | −6.5 pp | METC |
| FY2022 | +1.1 pp | CODQL |
| FY2021 | −5.2 pp | METC |
| FY2020 | −12.6 pp | METC |
| FY2019 | −1.0 pp | METC |
| FY2018 | −5.2 pp | METC |
| FY2017 | +43.8 pp | CODQL |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CODQL and METC over this period.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CODQL's net margin has been more volatile than METC's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 14.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 13.7.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CODQL and METC over these 9 fiscal years — CODQL led in 2 and METC in 7.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CODQL's return on equity has been more volatile than METC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 34.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 16.6.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CODQL and METC over these 8 fiscal years — CODQL led in 2 and METC in 6.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.