Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / COST VS M

COST vs M

Costco Wholesale Corp. and Macy's, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

COST vs M, at a glance
Metric COST M
Revenue$275.2B$22.6B
Net income$8.1B$642.0M
Gross margin12.8%40.3%
Net margin2.9%2.8%
Return on equity30.7%13.6%
Diluted EPS$18.21$2.32
Dividend / share$4.92$0.73
Payout ratio27.0%30.7%
Free cash flow$7.8B$1.1B
Equity$29.2B$4.9B
Net debt / equity−0.29×0.24×
Current ratio1.03×1.49×
Revenue CAGR 5y10.5%5.5%
Profit CAGR 5y15.1%·

COST bills 12.2× the revenue of M, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (2.9% against 2.8%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

COST vs M, revenue by year
Fiscal year COST M
FY2025$275.2B$22.6B
FY2024$254.5B$23.0B
FY2023$242.3B$23.9B
FY2022$227.0B$25.4B
FY2021$195.9B$25.4B
FY2020$166.8B$17.3B
FY2019$152.7B$24.6B
FY2018$141.6B$25.0B
FY2017$129.0B$24.9B
FY2016$118.7B$25.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

COST vs M, net income by year
Fiscal year COST M
FY2025$8.1B$642.0M
FY2024$7.4B$582.0M
FY2023$6.3B$45.0M
FY2022$5.8B$1.1B
FY2021$5.0B$1.4B
FY2020$4.0B$-3.9B
FY2019$3.7B$564.0M
FY2018$3.1B$1.1B
FY2017$2.7B$1.6B
FY2016$2.4B$627.0M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$252,614,000,000COST
FY2024+$231,447,000,000COST
FY2023+$218,424,000,000COST
FY2022+$201,505,000,000COST
FY2021+$170,530,000,000COST
FY2020+$149,415,000,000COST
FY2019+$128,143,000,000COST
FY2018+$116,605,000,000COST
FY2017+$104,086,000,000COST
FY2016+$92,811,000,000COST
FY2015+$89,120,000,000COST
FY2014+$84,535,000,000COST
FY2013+$77,225,000,000COST
FY2012+$71,451,000,000COST
FY2011+$62,510,000,000COST
FY2010+$52,943,000,000COST
FY2009+$47,933,000,000COST
FY2008+$47,591,000,000COST

COST has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+0.1 ppCOST
FY2024+0.4 ppCOST
FY2023+2.4 ppCOST
FY2022−1.9 ppM
FY2021−3.0 ppM
FY2020+25.2 ppCOST
FY2019+0.1 ppCOST
FY2018−2.2 ppM
FY2017−4.1 ppM
FY2016−0.4 ppM
FY2015−1.9 ppM
FY2014−3.6 ppM
FY2013−3.4 ppM
FY2012−3.0 ppM
FY2011−3.0 ppM
FY2010−1.7 ppM
FY2009+0.1 ppCOST
FY2008+21.0 ppCOST

The higher net margin has changed hands between COST and M over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

M's net margin has been more volatile than COST's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 7.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.4.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between COST and M over these 18 fiscal years — COST led in 7 and M in 11.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

M's return on equity has been more volatile than COST's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 32.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between COST and M over these 18 fiscal years — COST led in 10 and M in 8.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages