CZR vs HLT
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CZR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5B | $12.0B |
| Net income | $-502.0M | $1.5B |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | −3.8% | 12.1% |
| Return on equity | −13.1% | · |
| Diluted EPS | −$2.42 | $6.12 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.60 |
| Payout ratio | · | 9.8% |
| Free cash flow | $497.0M | $2.0B |
| Equity | $3.5B | $-5.4B |
| Net debt / equity | 3.11× | · |
| Current ratio | 0.80× | 0.66× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 25.9% | 22.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CZR and HLT book revenue within 15% of each other, and CZR closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CZR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $11.5B | $12.0B |
| FY2024 | $11.2B | $11.2B |
| FY2023 | $11.5B | $10.2B |
| FY2022 | $10.8B | $8.8B |
| FY2021 | $9.6B | $5.8B |
| FY2020 | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| FY2019 | $2.5B | $9.5B |
| FY2018 | $2.1B | $8.9B |
| FY2017 | $1.5B | $8.1B |
| FY2016 | $900.5M | $6.6B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CZR | HLT |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-502.0M | $1.5B |
| FY2024 | $-278.0M | $1.5B |
| FY2023 | $786.0M | $1.1B |
| FY2022 | $-899.0M | $1.3B |
| FY2021 | $-1.0B | $410.0M |
| FY2020 | $-1.8B | $-715.0M |
| FY2019 | $81.0M | $881.0M |
| FY2018 | $95.0M | $764.0M |
| FY2017 | $73.4M | $1.1B |
| FY2016 | $24.5M | $338.0M |
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$553,000,000 | HLT |
| FY2024 | +$71,000,000 | CZR |
| FY2023 | +$1,293,000,000 | CZR |
| FY2022 | +$2,048,000,000 | CZR |
| FY2021 | +$3,782,000,000 | CZR |
| FY2020 | −$679,000,000 | HLT |
| FY2019 | −$6,924,000,000 | HLT |
| FY2018 | −$6,850,000,000 | HLT |
| FY2017 | −$6,650,202,000 | HLT |
| FY2016 | −$5,675,535,000 | HLT |
| FY2015 | −$6,413,216,000 | HLT |
| FY2014 | −$10,140,177,000 | HLT |
| FY2013 | −$9,487,814,000 | HLT |
| FY2012 | −$8,979,730,000 | HLT |
The higher-revenue side has changed between CZR and HLT over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
14 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −15.9 pp | HLT |
| FY2024 | −15.6 pp | HLT |
| FY2023 | −4.1 pp | HLT |
| FY2022 | −22.7 pp | HLT |
| FY2021 | −17.6 pp | HLT |
| FY2020 | −31.7 pp | HLT |
| FY2019 | −6.2 pp | HLT |
| FY2018 | −4.0 pp | HLT |
| FY2017 | −8.4 pp | HLT |
| FY2016 | −2.7 pp | HLT |
| FY2015 | −4.0 pp | HLT |
| FY2014 | −10.5 pp | HLT |
| FY2013 | +2.9 pp | CZR |
| FY2012 | −4.2 pp | HLT |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CZR and HLT over this period.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CZR's net margin has been more volatile than HLT's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 14.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.1.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CZR and HLT over these 14 fiscal years — CZR led in 1 and HLT in 13.
14 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CZR's return on equity has been more volatile than HLT's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 20.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 19.2.
7 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CZR and HLT over these 7 fiscal years — CZR led in 3 and HLT in 4.
7 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.