FLUT vs META
Flutter Entertainment PLC and Meta Platforms, Inc., side by side — 4 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | FLUT | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.4B | $201.0B |
| Net income | $-407.0M | $60.5B |
| Gross margin | 45.2% | 82.0% |
| Net margin | −2.5% | 30.1% |
| Return on equity | −4.4% | 30.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$1.75 | $23.49 |
| Dividend / share | · | $2.10 |
| Payout ratio | · | 8.8% |
| Free cash flow | $1.1B | $46.1B |
| Equity | $9.0B | $217.2B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.15× | 0.11× |
| Current ratio | 0.95× | 2.60× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 18.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 15.7% |
META bills 12.3× the revenue of FLUT, and FLUT closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
4 years side by side
| Fiscal year | FLUT | META |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $16.4B | $201.0B |
| FY2024 | $14.0B | $164.5B |
| FY2023 | $11.8B | $134.9B |
| FY2022 | $9.5B | $116.6B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | FLUT | META |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-407.0M | $60.5B |
| FY2024 | $162.0M | $62.4B |
| FY2023 | $-1.2B | $39.1B |
| FY2022 | $-370.0M | $23.2B |
Standard deviation, each side
META's net margin has been more volatile than FLUT's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 6.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.1.
4 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
META led in net margin in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
4 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
META's return on equity has been more volatile than FLUT's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 6.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.
4 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
META led in return on equity in every one of the 4 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
4 of 15 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.