GOOD vs HBUV
Gladstone Commercial Corp. and Hubilu Venture Corporation, side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GOOD | HBUV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $161.3M | $2.2M |
| Net income | $19.3M | $-551,442 |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 12.0% | −25.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | — |
| Diluted EPS | $0.14 | −$0.02 |
| Dividend / share | $1.20 | — |
| Payout ratio | 353.5% | — |
| Free cash flow | $-24.9M | $-670,839 |
| Equity | $171.8M | $-1.8M |
| Net debt / equity | 4.85× | — |
| Current ratio | — | 0.05× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.9% | — |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 5.2% | — |
GOOD bills 73.2× the revenue of HBUV, and HBUV closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GOOD | HBUV |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $161.3M | $2.2M |
| FY2024 | $149.4M | $2.2M |
| FY2023 | $147.6M | $1.9M |
| FY2022 | $149.0M | $1.6M |
| FY2021 | $137.7M | $1.2M |
| FY2019 | $114.4M | $442,965 |
| FY2018 | $106.8M | $225,651 |
| FY2016 | $86.4M | $1,800 |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GOOD | HBUV |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $19.3M | $-551,442 |
| FY2024 | $24.0M | $-186,237 |
| FY2023 | $5.0M | $-275,332 |
| FY2022 | $10.8M | $-146,705 |
| FY2021 | $10.9M | $42,863 |
| FY2019 | $9.6M | $-577,257 |
| FY2018 | $12.3M | $-370,473 |
| FY2016 | $4.0M | $-212,564 |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280
More in this industry