Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / HLF VS NUS

HLF vs NUS

Herbalife Ltd. and NU Skin Enterprises, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

HLF vs NUS, at a glance
Metric HLF NUS
Revenue$5.0B$1.5B
Net income$228.3M$160.2M
Gross margin77.9%69.4%
Net margin4.5%10.8%
Return on equity·22.0%
Diluted EPS$2.20$3.18
Dividend / share··
Payout ratio·7.4%
Free cash flow$252.9M$46.0M
Equity$-515.1M$805.2M
Net debt / equity·−0.02×
Current ratio1.13×2.08×
Revenue CAGR 5y−1.9%−10.5%
Profit CAGR 5y−9.3%−3.5%

HLF bills 3.4× the revenue of NUS, and NUS keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.8% against 4.5%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

HLF vs NUS, revenue by year
Fiscal year HLF NUS
FY2025$5.0B$1.5B
FY2024$5.0B$1.7B
FY2023$5.1B$2.0B
FY2022$5.2B$2.2B
FY2021$5.8B$2.7B
FY2020$5.5B$2.6B
FY2019$4.9B$2.4B
FY2018$4.9B$2.7B
FY2017$4.4B$2.3B
FY2016$4.5B$2.2B
Net income by year

Bottom line

HLF vs NUS, net income by year
Fiscal year HLF NUS
FY2025$228.3M$160.2M
FY2024$254.3M$-146.6M
FY2023$142.2M$8.6M
FY2022$321.3M$104.8M
FY2021$447.2M$147.3M
FY2020$372.6M$191.4M
FY2019$311.0M$173.6M
FY2018$296.6M$121.9M
FY2017$213.9M$129.4M
FY2016$260.0M$143.1M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$3,552,341,000HLF
FY2024+$3,261,016,000HLF
FY2023+$3,093,269,000HLF
FY2022+$2,978,741,000HLF
FY2021+$3,107,131,000HLF
FY2020+$2,959,866,000HLF
FY2019+$2,456,684,000HLF
FY2018+$2,212,792,000HLF
FY2017+$2,148,601,000HLF
FY2016+$2,280,603,000HLF
FY2015+$2,221,953,000HLF
FY2014+$2,389,105,000HLF
FY2013+$1,648,582,000HLF
FY2012+$1,940,043,000HLF
FY2011+$1,734,949,000HLF
FY2010+$1,196,967,000HLF
FY2009+$993,519,000HLF

HLF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−6.3 ppNUS
FY2024+13.6 ppHLF
FY2023+2.4 ppHLF
FY2022+1.5 ppHLF
FY2021+2.2 ppHLF
FY2020−0.7 ppNUS
FY2019−0.8 ppNUS
FY2018+1.5 ppHLF
FY2017−0.8 ppNUS
FY2016−0.7 ppNUS
FY2015+1.7 ppHLF
FY2014−1.1 ppNUS
FY2013−0.6 ppNUS
FY2012+1.0 ppHLF
FY2011+3.1 ppHLF
FY2010+1.9 ppHLF
FY2009+2.0 ppHLF

The higher net margin has changed hands between HLF and NUS over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

NUS's net margin has been more volatile than HLF's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 4.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between HLF and NUS over these 17 fiscal years — HLF led in 10 and NUS in 7.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HLF's return on equity has been more volatile than NUS's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 15.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.5.

6 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

HLF led in return on equity in every one of the 6 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

6 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages