AIJTY vs BIDU
Jianpu Technology Inc. and Baidu, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AIJTY | BIDU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CNY 978.8M | CNY 129.1B |
| Net income | CNY 32.1M | CNY 5.6B |
| Gross margin | 33.2% | 43.9% |
| Net margin | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 2.1% |
| Diluted EPS | CNY 0.08 | · |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | 798.7% | · |
| Free cash flow | CNY 105.3M | CNY -15.1B |
| Equity | CNY 293.5M | CNY 266.3B |
| Net debt / equity | · | 0.07× |
| Current ratio | 1.63× | 1.76× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.8% | 3.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | −24.3% |
BIDU bills 131.9× the revenue of AIJTY, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (4.2% against 3.3%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AIJTY | BIDU |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 978.8M | CNY 129.1B |
| FY2024 | CNY 1.0B | CNY 133.1B |
| FY2023 | CNY 1.1B | CNY 134.6B |
| FY2022 | CNY 989.7M | CNY 123.7B |
| FY2021 | CNY 805.0M | CNY 124.5B |
| FY2020 | CNY 585.8M | CNY 107.1B |
| FY2019 | CNY 1.4B | CNY 107.4B |
| FY2018 | CNY 1.9B | CNY 102.3B |
| FY2017 | CNY 1.4B | CNY 84.8B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AIJTY | BIDU |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 32.1M | CNY 5.6B |
| FY2024 | CNY 106.1M | CNY 23.8B |
| FY2023 | CNY -26.8M | CNY 20.3B |
| FY2022 | CNY -124.3M | CNY 7.6B |
| FY2021 | CNY -199.8M | CNY 10.2B |
| FY2020 | CNY -304.1M | CNY 22.5B |
| FY2019 | CNY -451.8M | CNY 2.1B |
| FY2018 | CNY -164.6M | CNY 27.6B |
| FY2017 | CNY -202.1M | CNY 18.3B |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −CNY 128,100,227,000 | BIDU |
| FY2024 | −CNY 132,118,929,000 | BIDU |
| FY2023 | −CNY 133,528,587,000 | BIDU |
| FY2022 | −CNY 122,685,325,000 | BIDU |
| FY2021 | −CNY 123,687,953,000 | BIDU |
| FY2020 | −CNY 106,488,238,000 | BIDU |
| FY2019 | −CNY 105,977,273,000 | BIDU |
| FY2018 | −CNY 100,355,124,000 | BIDU |
| FY2017 | −CNY 83,363,227,000 | BIDU |
BIDU has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −1.0 pp | BIDU |
| FY2024 | −7.6 pp | BIDU |
| FY2023 | −18.5 pp | BIDU |
| FY2022 | −19.7 pp | BIDU |
| FY2021 | −31.4 pp | BIDU |
| FY2020 | −71.1 pp | BIDU |
| FY2019 | −34.8 pp | BIDU |
| FY2018 | −30.4 pp | BIDU |
| FY2017 | −36.8 pp | BIDU |
BIDU has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 9 fiscal years.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AIJTY's net margin has been more volatile than BIDU's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 19.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.4.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
BIDU led in net margin in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AIJTY's return on equity has been more volatile than BIDU's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 19.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.3.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between AIJTY and BIDU over these 9 fiscal years — AIJTY led in 2 and BIDU in 7.
9 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.