AIJTY vs GDS
Jianpu Technology Inc. and GDS Holdings Ltd., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AIJTY | GDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CNY 978.8M | CNY 11.4B |
| Net income | CNY 32.1M | CNY 949.6M |
| Gross margin | 33.2% | 22.6% |
| Net margin | 3.3% | 8.4% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 3.9% |
| Diluted EPS | CNY 0.08 | CNY 0.55 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | 798.7% | · |
| Free cash flow | CNY 105.3M | CNY -1.3B |
| Equity | CNY 293.5M | CNY 25.8B |
| Net debt / equity | · | 0.45× |
| Current ratio | 1.63× | 2.60× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.8% | 14.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
GDS bills 11.7× the revenue of AIJTY, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.4% against 3.3%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AIJTY | GDS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 978.8M | CNY 11.4B |
| FY2024 | CNY 1.0B | CNY 10.3B |
| FY2023 | CNY 1.1B | CNY 9.8B |
| FY2022 | CNY 989.7M | CNY 9.3B |
| FY2021 | CNY 805.0M | CNY 7.8B |
| FY2020 | CNY 585.8M | CNY 5.7B |
| FY2019 | CNY 1.4B | CNY 4.1B |
| FY2018 | CNY 1.9B | CNY 2.8B |
| FY2017 | CNY 1.4B | CNY 1.6B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AIJTY | GDS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 32.1M | CNY 949.6M |
| FY2024 | CNY 106.1M | CNY 3.4B |
| FY2023 | CNY -26.8M | CNY -4.3B |
| FY2022 | CNY -124.3M | CNY -1.3B |
| FY2021 | CNY -199.8M | CNY -1.2B |
| FY2020 | CNY -304.1M | CNY -666.4M |
| FY2019 | CNY -451.8M | CNY -442.1M |
| FY2018 | CNY -164.6M | CNY -430.3M |
| FY2017 | CNY -202.1M | CNY -326.9M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −CNY 10,453,501,000 | GDS |
| FY2024 | −CNY 9,315,997,000 | GDS |
| FY2023 | −CNY 8,713,035,000 | GDS |
| FY2022 | −CNY 8,278,426,000 | GDS |
| FY2021 | −CNY 7,013,634,000 | GDS |
| FY2020 | −CNY 5,153,210,000 | GDS |
| FY2019 | −CNY 2,686,678,000 | GDS |
| FY2018 | −CNY 870,201,000 | GDS |
| FY2017 | −CNY 170,393,000 | GDS |
GDS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −5.1 pp | GDS |
| FY2024 | −21.5 pp | GDS |
| FY2023 | +41.3 pp | AIJTY |
| FY2022 | +0.1 pp | AIJTY |
| FY2021 | −10.1 pp | GDS |
| FY2020 | −41.6 pp | GDS |
| FY2019 | −26.2 pp | GDS |
| FY2018 | +7.1 pp | AIJTY |
| FY2017 | +6.2 pp | AIJTY |
The higher net margin has changed hands between AIJTY and GDS over this period.
9 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GDS's net margin has been more volatile than AIJTY's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 19.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 19.0.
9 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between AIJTY and GDS over these 9 fiscal years — AIJTY led in 4 and GDS in 5.
9 of 12 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AIJTY's return on equity has been more volatile than GDS's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 19.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.5.
9 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between AIJTY and GDS over these 9 fiscal years — AIJTY led in 3 and GDS in 6.
9 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.