Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ATO VS CQP

ATO vs CQP

Atmos Energy Corp. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.p., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ATO vs CQP, at a glance
Metric ATO CQP
Revenue$4.7B$10.8B
Net income$1.2B$3.0B
Gross margin·52.2%
Net margin25.5%27.8%
Return on equity9.3%·
Diluted EPS$7.46·
Dividend / share$3.48·
Payout ratio46.2%·
Free cash flow$-1.5B$2.6B
Equity$13.6B·
Net debt / equity0.64×·
Current ratio0.77×0.78×
Revenue CAGR 5y10.8%11.8%
Profit CAGR 5y14.8%20.4%

CQP bills 2.3× the revenue of ATO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (27.8% against 25.5%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ATO vs CQP, revenue by year
Fiscal year ATO CQP
FY2025$4.7B$10.8B
FY2024$4.2B$8.7B
FY2023$4.3B$9.7B
FY2022$4.2B$17.2B
FY2021$3.4B$9.4B
FY2020$2.8B$6.2B
FY2019$2.9B$6.8B
FY2018$3.1B$6.4B
FY2017$2.8B$4.3B
FY2016$2.5B$1.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ATO vs CQP, net income by year
Fiscal year ATO CQP
FY2025$1.2B$3.0B
FY2024$1.0B$2.5B
FY2023$885.9M$4.3B
FY2022$774.4M$2.5B
FY2021$665.6M$1.6B
FY2020$601.4M$1.2B
FY2019$511.4M$1.2B
FY2018$603.1M$1.3B
FY2017$396.4M$490.0M
FY2016$350.1M$-171.0M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$6,055,245,000CQP
FY2024−$4,538,813,000CQP
FY2023−$5,388,643,000CQP
FY2022−$13,004,338,000CQP
FY2021−$6,027,510,000CQP
FY2020−$3,345,863,000CQP
FY2019−$3,936,152,000CQP
FY2018−$3,311,454,000CQP
FY2017−$1,544,265,000CQP
FY2016+$1,354,648,000ATO
FY2015+$2,656,985,000ATO
FY2014+$4,672,218,000ATO
FY2013+$3,607,269,000ATO
FY2012+$3,171,664,000ATO
FY2011+$4,002,547,000ATO
FY2010+$4,261,778,000ATO
FY2009+$4,452,321,000ATO

The higher-revenue side has changed between ATO and CQP over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−2.3 ppCQP
FY2024−3.8 ppCQP
FY2023−23.3 ppCQP
FY2022+3.9 ppATO
FY2021+2.3 ppATO
FY2020+2.1 ppATO
FY2019+0.4 ppATO
FY2018−0.5 ppCQP
FY2017+3.0 ppATO
FY2016+29.8 ppATO
FY2015+128.9 ppATO
FY2014+158.5 ppATO
FY2013+102.5 ppATO
FY2012+72.6 ppATO
FY2011+23.7 ppATO
FY2010−22.5 ppCQP
FY2009−40.9 ppCQP

The higher net margin has changed hands between ATO and CQP over this period.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CQP's net margin has been more volatile than ATO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 58.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.3.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ATO and CQP over these 17 fiscal years — ATO led in 11 and CQP in 6.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages