ATO vs CQP
Atmos Energy Corp. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.p., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7B | $10.8B |
| Net income | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Gross margin | 66.0% | 47.1% |
| Net margin | 25.5% | 27.8% |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | — |
| Diluted EPS | $7.46 | $3.00 |
| Dividend / share | $3.48 | — |
| Payout ratio | 46.2% | — |
| Free cash flow | $-1.5B | $2.6B |
| Equity | $13.6B | — |
| Net debt / equity | 0.64× | — |
| Current ratio | 0.77× | 0.78× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.8% | 11.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 14.8% | 20.4% |
CQP bills 2.3× the revenue of ATO, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (27.8% against 25.5%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.7B | $10.8B |
| FY2024 | $4.2B | $8.7B |
| FY2023 | $4.3B | $9.7B |
| FY2022 | $4.2B | $17.2B |
| FY2021 | $3.4B | $9.4B |
| FY2020 | $2.8B | $6.2B |
| FY2019 | $2.9B | $6.8B |
| FY2018 | $3.1B | $6.4B |
| FY2017 | $2.8B | $4.3B |
| FY2016 | $2.5B | $1.1B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| FY2024 | $1.0B | $2.5B |
| FY2023 | $885.9M | $4.3B |
| FY2022 | $774.4M | $2.5B |
| FY2021 | $665.6M | $1.6B |
| FY2020 | $601.4M | $1.2B |
| FY2019 | $511.4M | $1.2B |
| FY2018 | $603.1M | $1.3B |
| FY2017 | $396.4M | $490.0M |
| FY2016 | $350.1M | $-171.0M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280