Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / META VS MTCH

META vs MTCH

Meta Platforms, Inc. and Match Group, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

META vs MTCH, at a glance
Metric META MTCH
Revenue$201.0B$3.5B
Net income$60.5B$613.5M
Gross margin82.0%72.8%
Net margin30.1%17.6%
Return on equity30.2%·
Diluted EPS$23.49$2.38
Dividend / share$2.10$0.76
Payout ratio8.8%30.4%
Free cash flow$46.1B$1.0B
Equity$217.2B$-253.5M
Net debt / equity0.11×·
Current ratio2.60×1.42×
Revenue CAGR 5y18.5%7.8%
Profit CAGR 5y15.7%22.6%

META bills 57.6× the revenue of MTCH, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (30.1% against 17.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

META vs MTCH, revenue by year
Fiscal year META MTCH
FY2025$201.0B$3.5B
FY2024$164.5B$3.5B
FY2023$134.9B$3.4B
FY2022$116.6B$3.2B
FY2021$117.9B$3.0B
FY2020$86.0B$2.4B
FY2019$70.7B$2.1B
FY2018$55.8B$1.7B
FY2017$40.7B$3.3B
FY2016$27.6B$3.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

META vs MTCH, net income by year
Fiscal year META MTCH
FY2025$60.5B$613.5M
FY2024$62.4B$551.3M
FY2023$39.1B$651.5M
FY2022$23.2B$359.9M
FY2021$39.4B$276.6M
FY2020$29.1B$221.6M
FY2019$18.5B$566.5M
FY2018$22.1B$757.7M
FY2017$15.9B$358.0M
FY2016$10.2B$-16.2M
Revenue gap over time

16 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$197,478,803,000META
FY2024+$161,021,627,000META
FY2023+$131,537,496,000META
FY2022+$113,420,157,000META
FY2021+$114,945,723,000META
FY2020+$83,573,731,000META
FY2019+$68,645,742,000META
FY2018+$54,108,150,000META
FY2017+$37,345,761,000META
FY2016+$24,498,118,000META
FY2015+$14,697,067,000META
FY2014+$9,356,453,000META
FY2013+$4,849,013,000META
FY2012+$2,288,067,000META
FY2011+$1,651,556,000META
FY2010+$337,185,000META

META has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

16 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+12.5 ppMETA
FY2024+22.1 ppMETA
FY2023+9.6 ppMETA
FY2022+8.6 ppMETA
FY2021+24.1 ppMETA
FY2020+24.6 ppMETA
FY2019−1.5 ppMTCH
FY2018−4.2 ppMTCH
FY2017+28.4 ppMETA
FY2016+37.5 ppMETA
FY2015+17.1 ppMETA
FY2014+10.4 ppMETA
FY2013+9.7 ppMETA
FY2012−4.7 ppMTCH
FY2011+18.6 ppMETA
FY2010+24.9 ppMETA

The higher net margin has changed hands between META and MTCH over this period.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MTCH's net margin has been more volatile than META's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 10.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.6.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between META and MTCH over these 16 fiscal years — META led in 13 and MTCH in 3.

16 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MTCH's return on equity has been more volatile than META's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 8.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.0.

9 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between META and MTCH over these 9 fiscal years — META led in 5 and MTCH in 4.

9 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages