Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CRM VS INTU

CRM vs INTU

Salesforce, Inc. and Intuit Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CRM vs INTU, at a glance
Metric CRM INTU
Revenue$41.5B$18.8B
Net income$7.5B$3.9B
Gross margin77.7%·
Net margin18.0%20.5%
Return on equity12.4%20.3%
Diluted EPS$7.80$13.67
Dividend / share·$4.16
Payout ratio21.3%30.7%
Free cash flow$14.4B$6.1B
Equity$59.1B$19.7B
Net debt / equity0.12×0.16×
Current ratio0.76×1.36×
Revenue CAGR 5y14.3%19.7%
Profit CAGR 5y12.9%16.2%

CRM bills 2.2× the revenue of INTU, and INTU keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (20.5% against 18.0%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CRM vs INTU, revenue by year
Fiscal year CRM INTU
FY2025$41.5B$18.8B
FY2024$37.9B$16.3B
FY2023$34.9B$14.4B
FY2022$31.4B$12.7B
FY2021$26.5B$9.6B
FY2020$21.3B$7.7B
FY2019$17.1B$6.8B
FY2018$13.3B$6.0B
FY2017$10.5B$5.2B
FY2016$8.4B$4.7B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CRM vs INTU, net income by year
Fiscal year CRM INTU
FY2025$7.5B$3.9B
FY2024$6.2B$3.0B
FY2023$4.1B$2.4B
FY2022$208.0M$2.1B
FY2021$1.4B$2.1B
FY2020$4.1B$1.8B
FY2019$126.0M$1.6B
FY2018$1.1B$1.3B
FY2017$360.0M$985.0M
FY2016$323.0M$979.0M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$22,694,000,000CRM
FY2024+$21,610,000,000CRM
FY2023+$20,489,000,000CRM
FY2022+$18,626,000,000CRM
FY2021+$16,859,000,000CRM
FY2020+$13,573,000,000CRM
FY2019+$10,314,000,000CRM
FY2018+$7,257,000,000CRM
FY2017+$5,344,000,000CRM
FY2016+$3,743,000,000CRM
FY2015+$2,475,216,000CRM
FY2014+$1,130,586,000CRM
FY2013+$125,003,000CRM
FY2012+$2,859,216,000CRM
FY2011−$1,182,461,000INTU
FY2010−$1,745,861,000INTU
FY2009−$1,803,417,000INTU
FY2008−$1,916,231,000INTU

The higher-revenue side has changed between CRM and INTU over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−2.6 ppINTU
FY2024−1.8 ppINTU
FY2023−4.7 ppINTU
FY2022−15.6 ppINTU
FY2021−16.0 ppINTU
FY2020−4.6 ppINTU
FY2019−22.2 ppINTU
FY2018−13.7 ppINTU
FY2017−15.5 ppINTU
FY2016−17.0 ppINTU
FY2015−9.4 ppINTU
FY2014−26.3 ppINTU
FY2013−27.4 ppINTU
FY2012−24.9 ppINTU
FY2011−18.9 ppINTU
FY2010−12.7 ppINTU
FY2009−7.9 ppINTU
FY2008−11.5 ppINTU

INTU has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 18 fiscal years.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CRM's net margin has been more volatile than INTU's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 7.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

INTU led in net margin in every one of the 18 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

INTU's return on equity has been more volatile than CRM's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 15.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.1.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

INTU led in return on equity in every one of the 18 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages